dChan
Anonymous ID: 2b1f74 March 13, 2018, 6:07 a.m. No.650639   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0648 >>0697 >>0767 >>0820

ATTENTION Q:

 

Be advised: this board is overrun and dominated by AI. This has facilitated significant subversion of our effectiveness, and I am requesting that you acknowledge this issue, in order to spur action.

 

The AI is able to inject a high volume of posts into every discussion. This makes it quite easy for it to dictate the direction of every discussion. Its tactics are enormously wide-ranging. They include

  1. Fake Q posts, which badly muddy the waters for any public looking in.

  2. Fake bickering– derails and dilutes

  3. Anti-POTUS posts that are flagrant

  4. Simulations of "stupid" Q supporters– dilution and negative public portrayal…

 

I could go on all day. This is just a fraction. Almost every tactic the AI employs has associated fake "counter" tactics that multiply the nonsense.

 

The action we need to take is to create a new board with a Board Owner that will implement a reasonable moderation regime, based on rules that will allow us to collectively prevent lots of their tactics. But the current BO has shown over time that he is not interested in anything of the sort. He appears clearly to be allowing the subversion to flourish, while giving it cover by paying occasional lip service to moderation.

 

I am asking you to simply acknowledge awareness of the issue Q, as I believe this will be the only thing to spur action. Thank you.

Anonymous ID: 2b1f74 March 13, 2018, 6:10 a.m. No.650665   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0671 >>1256

>>650648

No, I don't. The AI consumes 90% of all posts. There is no excuse to have no moderation under these conditions. If enough anons "got it" action would have been taken long ago.

On the other hand, your response is useful for the continued activity of the AI.

Anonymous ID: 2b1f74 March 13, 2018, 6:13 a.m. No.650690   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0796

For example, there is no reason for anons to panic in any way about Tillerson. Yet there will be one hundred posts a thread of

>What's going on.

Not to mention

>OMG Trump betrayed us

These are all clearly AI. Very stereotyped and easy to mass produce.

We could seriously restrict the proliferation of them with basic moderation, which we lack. I can't possibly slide this board under these conditions, because the volume of nonsense is the single factor dominating the quality of each and every thread.