>>>650673
>>Trump appears to hire some people to do a particular job for him and that is it.
>I'm leaning towards this theory as well.
Yes. I think Tillerson, being a well known, trusted and respected businessman who knew all the players was the best guy to get the trust built up for Trump's economic agenda.
He could lay out the business perspective long term and explain where trump was going.
Now, phase 2/ crunch time and you have Pompeo, a military/spook, who plays the same role as Tillerson did. He brings experience and trust in cooperative military operations.
Look at it another way. If you're foreign military command, do you want an experienced military guy like Pompeo explaining what going to go down, or would you want someone out of that bevy of Euro chick ministers they have running the the show over there?
Cue up that photo/scene of the Euro chicks vs Mad dog and the Russian guy, you'll get the idea.
I think this is just a strategic move. Tillerson did his job very well. Pompeo brings the good for the next operational phase.