>>6506093 (pb)

>this would be a massive undertaking anon.

Agreed though it has been nagging at me for some time.

Have some knowledge of it from past experience, which is why I brought it to the best diggers in the world.

Can do some of the digging myself however it is as you said a massive undertaking.

Best would be to split up companies via resignation anon list and then tie together

Might also be best to first prioritize the companies by "most suspicious"