>>6508506

He said what he did happened because of his own inner struggle. He succombed to a gambling temptation and tried to profit off of . . . some kind of a bet?

but that he immediately realized his mistake, though it was irrversible. He'd crossed a line one should never cross?

can't fathom but we don't need to because

he further says that it will all be known and that anon will hate him.

so we don't know now. Most sane people feel remorse.

we forgive him without even knowing what he did that made him so awful that he faked his death. wait did I say faked his death.

struggled with throwing himself in front of a moving truck . . . which would harm another person. . .

abandoned his dog who we hear bark a few times during the final live-cast.

I'm sorry, it's seeming that we really can't know if he's really gone. But we can see his remorse.

but he's a really good actor?

He seemed rather convincing in his 'Jesus is the Way and Light' narrative.

so hopefully it's misinfromatin that he's dead.

he'll turn up at a trial?

He'll be there for the parade?

He passed to the West out of Middle Earth?

He'll be there in heaven singing with the choirs as fortold in the Book of Revelations and we will all be there too to Praise the Lord.

I want to know who has his dog.

The dog is the one that knows

what is really going on.

picture posted IS and Arizona dog, but not Issac's dog.

>>6508933

https://biblehub.com/esv/matthew/1.htm

Start here and read all four Gospels.

>>6508591

It might be considered a threat to tell someone you are going to help them see heaven.

even if you don't believe in Heaven, you probably don't know what the Bible really tells us.

It tells us about War in Heaven.

so what's that all about?

they don't tell us that when they say 'you go to Heaven when you die'.

Prove Heaven?

that's rediculous.

>>6509092

if it does or doesn't

then the answer depends on that.

if it doesn't and I say that it does then I was made to say that?

do you know what the doctrine says about free will?

you ought to lurk more in that direction, and read all about it instead of trying to pose intellectual traps about theology.

If you have an understanding, why do you need to fish for someone else's fallacies first?

does your 'informative discourses' about 'free will' already have a conclusion? or are you up to learn some things yourself?

You are trying to be a mysterious mentor, it seems. If you know anything real then just spill it.