>>6508481 LB
> but realized he had me muted
yeah it's weird how from your points,
he takes over to regurgitate
and basically get back to generic nothings,
completely losing whatever specifics you brought to the conversation…
quite similar to what AJ often did/does with his guests, i notice
>Highly attacked
kek, yep.
because
<Kevin Annett, Member of the International Tribunal on Crimes of Chruch and State
being basically the only Member of the International Tribunal on Crimes of Chruch and State
is "the International Tribunal on Crimes of Chruch and State"
careful with that thing.
ah, intresting.
first time i'm seeing a periodic elements connection with the tripcodes…
got a work-in-progress theory?
Mostly read the motives of his rejection by Native communities in Canada that saw him as a scammer. That sealed the deal for me after seeing him around for a few years with "too good to be true but wish they were" statements.
Don't have a solid case against him or interest to pursue much, so as i said, just be careful.
choices are always yours
that's glorious/perfect
> utterly destroyed
well, i getcha, i probably would've fully agreed at some time, even, but…
thing is, their destruction is already well advanced, and we can already have a taste at how it's going.
if the void is not replaced with something else, knowingly, then the void is replaced with something else unknowingly.
that's why the SJW type is such a moral, preaching proselyte: they are deeply religious, but all the more so because they don't know that they are, they don't see their orders for moral good as ideology
>Everyone on twitter
<Everyone
well, every loudmouth/user that bothers to post in a specific sandbox, maybe
the replacement is not a thing in the future, it's ongoing and has been for a long time.
it's not so bad (or effective) when honest about it, but the deeper acting forces aren't.
i guess money/social status has ruled for a while.
the sjw sparrow insanity is a challenge to that, i guess
yup, just irked at how often "digital journalists" attempt to pull off that trick. most readers don't realize how limited an "everyone" can be, as a sample. just like polls, in many ways
now that's stellar jpeg police work, bravo.
not being sarcastic (well except the job description), respect the effort put in
>>but all the more so because they don't know that they are,
>Whatchu talkin' 'bout Willis?
>You ain't even making sense now.
I mean they're not "religious" in the most obvious meaning, but being that they think they have thrown away all that relates to the religious, that they are free from it, but it's still there and being hidden by denial, it comes back in a negative form, with all the worst aspects it can have.
What do people despise about zealots going around preaching loudly to others how to live their lives, all too often outed as hypocrites? That they blindly want to enforce what they firmly believe is "better for all", regardless of all's opinions on the matter.
And that is pretty much exactly what our typical annoying SJW does.
They are the Temperance Leagues of our day.