God abides…and he hates the fucking Eagles, man
Then why create the world?
It's a good discussion, but honestly it seems like "we" were all ok before being "sent" to the world.
I've been considering the Gnostic position, and maybe (my own twist) God cannot exactly directly affect this realm (pure physicality) and he needs us to make the vision of perfection in the pure spirit world a reality in the physical world.
All "he" can do is guide.
Which is interesting, seeing how god knows everything - except what it's like to be a mortal man.
That's actually an interesting concept…untraceable.
The concept of Free Will doesn't depend on unproven faith. Look at the concept of Satan. He had absolute proof that god exists and still rejected him.
Free Will means having all of the info, then making the choice.
I mean, you can post all of the illogical verses you want. Doesn't change the fact that god doesn't TRULY know what it's like to be a mortal man.
Simple….because he isn't mortal. Even in the guise of Jesus, if you believe that, dude was still raising the dead, etc. He knew he wasn't an ordinary mortal man.
"Mortal men" don't walk on water, water/wine, raise the dead. He knew he wasn't mortal and didn't have the same limitations we do.
That's using a cheat code.
Not until we take back control of our money supply. Until then, we continue to be slaves.
So…..Jesus PROVED it to him with direct evidence. See what I mean?
Unfortunately the rest of us don't have that privilege.
Maybe I've seen some weird shit in my life and my mind isn't closed. Just that the Bible never clicked with me. IF it is all revealed to be so, then it will be I suppose.
Until then, we're all still brothers in this mission.
Too many equally viable (or equally ridiculous) viewpoints out there. Not enough information.
My mind is what it is, which means if it's that important then the creator will adjust his message to satisfy us all to understand/accept the message. If not, that's kind of bullshit. Belief is not a conscious choice…criteria for belief is different depending on the individual.
Which is why the muslims claiming they will "convert" the whole world is absurd. All they will achieve is a bunch of people lying about believing.
Been seeking for 50 years, anon….nothing definitive, and so I keep seeking.
However, fate led me here so who knows what comes next?
I'll be standing shoulder to shoulder with the rest of you dedicated to fighting "evil" and reclaiming freedom. That's all that matters.
Great, then he knows how to present his truth in a way that will trigger "belief" in this mind that he created.
WWG1WGA.
There is certainly a Grand Unheaval coming. I'm not fastened, unmoving, to my preconceptions/habits.
I'm in the "detectable brain waves" camp, which is tricky.
You are asserting, a priori, things which have not been proven nor are self evident. Spirit, demons, etc….you are starting from your conclusion (standard biblical framework) and working backwards to justify it.
Hmmm….someone experienced and "white hat" to help helm the "new media" after MSM crashes and burns?
Yeah, but I rarely get into these discussions. Can't find anyone IRL that has thought about it hard enough. Just waiting on the BOOMs.
I mean, a pardon is a pretty big deal. Trump doesn't do anything for no reason.
Most normies will be lost without the handholding of some kind of MSM. This guy probably knows his shit and can set something up quick.
All the way to SCOTUS
Supreme Court review
Main article: Black v. United States
The Supreme Court of the United States heard an appeal of his case on 8 December 2009[58] and rendered a decision in June 2010. Black's application for bail was rejected by both the Supreme Court and the U.S. District Court judge who sentenced him.[59]
On 24 June 2010, the US Supreme Court ruled 8–0 with one recusal, instructing the 7th Circuit to review all four of Black's convictions including the obstruction of justice charge, finding that the definition of honest services fraud used in Judge St. Eve's (the trial judge) charge to the jury in Black's case was too broad, "unconstitutionally vague",[60] ruling the law could apply only to cases where bribes and kickbacks had changed hands and ordered the US 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago to review three fraud convictions against Black in light of the Supreme Court's new definition. The Court reviewed Black's case and determined whether his fraud convictions stood or if there should be a new trial.[61] The Supreme Court upheld the jailed former media baron's obstruction-of-justice conviction, for which he was serving a concurrent 6½-year sentence.[62]
Vacated all convictions for being vague, but upheld onstruction charges.