Anonymous ID: fe1b31 May 16, 2019, 5:43 a.m. No.6512091   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2101

>>6511598

This is rather like a poster child story about 'art' 'value' that almost serves as a proof as to the fraud of the art market.

Most of it is money laundering.

Most of it is fraud.

most of it is for tax purposes.

Anonymous ID: fe1b31 May 16, 2019, 5:55 a.m. No.6512132   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2141 >>2161 >>2400

>>6512111

and yet the story won't go away.

Tom Hanks with the creepy kerchief stuff.

as if he's glad a guy died.

 

the fact of where it happened.

that the bridge wasn't even that high.

that he 'forced himself' to do it.

 

That he almost admits in code that . . .

well that it's fake and gay that he's dead.

 

so they try to make us look foolish by giving us a lot of crap.

or what about the one where someone posts a picture of a hotel lobby and claims it

was blackmail evidence used against Issac: more fakeness.

 

But Issac was a real person.

and the facts of what he told us about Hollywood creepiness? probably also close to true.

 

and so they try to slide us off into bullshit.

 

Take that as a proof that ignoring this 'suicide' is a mistake: take this news as evidence and use what we learn from it.

 

this level of attention, by shills, to an issue, usually means we are right over the target.

Anonymous ID: fe1b31 May 16, 2019, 6:20 a.m. No.6512219   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6512141

you were so quick to respond to my long post, you read it and responded in less than a minute, like you didn't even think about what I said, or even read it.

 

and yet I ask you to explain your terseness, and you are mute.

 

and you are calling all diggers into the Issac Kappy story 'shills'

and 'seconding' other people who say the same.

 

Please explain all this?

 

what should be we digging?

Or are you only about what we should not do?

Anonymous ID: fe1b31 May 16, 2019, 6:28 a.m. No.6512260   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2267

>>6512161

I concur.

you are done with it.

that's fine.

and you aren't saying that no one else should be digging it, though.

 

that's different than those who try to get anyone to stop investigating it.

I think it's (b), on your list.

It could be (a) but why make it so high profile if it were.

Or (c) but who that goes on and on and on about Jesus Christ goes and kills themself a couple of days later putting other people into harms way?

 

So, yes, move on.

those who are telling us all to do that too, and ridicule those who don't, are out of line.

 

I suppose anon know this.

and also that it's true that a lot of what are presetned as 'digs' are just shill-shit flung in the board so that other shills can do exaclty what all the 'concerned anon' who want to make anyone who discusses Issac seem to be unhinged or 'sliding'

 

they slide a dig with bad material and then have other shills (assuming they are) say 'this dig is all a slide'

 

they throw the shit in the water and then say 'the water is polluted'.

 

I vote for (b) on your list. We don't really know.

and that curiosity is why other people dig, and we do too.

Anonymous ID: fe1b31 May 16, 2019, 6:34 a.m. No.6512283   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2302

>>6512267

I see you as a conformance shill in the effort to stop people from digging into the Issac story.

you confirm my suspecions by being a terse pissant.

 

pissant is a technical term. It describes you manner of interacting with other anon.

 

let's see what you come up with now.

 

The Kappy dig is a worthy dig.

the shills have thrown shit in the water.

you are of them, I believe.

Anonymous ID: fe1b31 May 16, 2019, 6:43 a.m. No.6512316   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2319

>>6512267

what else are you digging?

or are you only here to talk shit about what others dig.>>6512235

>>6512141

 

>>6512220

>>6512170

only one post that isn't about the Issac Kappy story:

>>6511920

 

 

confirmance shill post:

>>6512122

> e7e713

 

who is this 'we', you and your shill pals?

>>6512129

 

still obcessed with the Kappy dig:

>>6512220

trying to be combative:

>>6512235

put words in your mouth?

your terseness is just you being a bully.

oh, and someone who can think and type and have thoughts is 'verbose' in your description, and thus a . . . . .

 

so it's clear that the idea in question, if not a shill, is at least a bully.

and anon in questions does not like the Issac Kappy dig.

 

you are a little too attached to your need to quash the dig to be taken as anything other than a shill.

 

now be mean, because that is what you will do.

and be under control

Anonymous ID: fe1b31 May 16, 2019, 6:51 a.m. No.6512340   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2361 >>2375

>>6512319

real peole die

other people dig on the death

those who don't want a dig

give out misinformation and attack anyone

who discusses the subject.

not triggered, just outting the efforts here

to trash the story and to try and make people forget it.

 

Respect is what you lack.

 

no I am not triggered.

 

Is that what you wanted me to be?

Anonymous ID: fe1b31 May 16, 2019, 6:59 a.m. No.6512387   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6512324

Don't feed the shills.

I've addblocked your image, so I hope shills do use it. I won't see it.

 

try to build people to a place where they grow and learn, not just kick them in the nuts because you think it's a battle.

that person is not being fair or rational about the Issac Kappy dig.

there is much misinformatin being handed about.

and the purpose seems to be to stop people from doing any dig at all.

and I've posted concerning what I thought was false about some of the drops that have been posted to these boards. Some of the Kappy drops are useful and interesting.

If anon don't like it, move on. don't attack anyone else who tries to discuss the subject.