Anonymous ID: 0a33e2 May 16, 2019, 7:19 a.m. No.6512497   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Abbie Hoffman

contriversal and bombastic, liked to be shocking.

Grew up and tried to move on.

Suicided or Suicide from a guy

who you'd think had a lot left to do and say.

 

Yes, he was a leftist.

try to understand him and those who supported him to get to the heart

of those who have a chance to not be of the 4-5% who are said 'can not be saved'

Anonymous ID: 0a33e2 May 16, 2019, 7:41 a.m. No.6512630   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>6512553

>6512492

'powerful' NOT

is that the purpose you spreading these images for their 'powerful' cursing effect?

you give them this 'power' that is really just an illusion. you further them by posting these images.

 

that's how it seems from my end.

there is no other purpose of saying that they have 'great power'.

 

if it's so powerful why are spreading this manure here?

 

what are you really doing by saving and sharing these images and claiming them to be anything?

Anonymous ID: 0a33e2 May 16, 2019, 7:45 a.m. No.6512653   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2679 >>2691

>>6512587

Abortion is one of the 'third rails' of politics.

people who vote with their feelz

fall for the 'oh the holy mother has a choice' bullshit of the left.

 

and elections are lost because of that single issue because that is what a lot of people do, they fall for the 'my choice to be an in humane beast and murder and infant' lies.

Anonymous ID: 0a33e2 May 16, 2019, 7:52 a.m. No.6512692   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6512599

are you describing what you and inappropriately close selfie poster are shilling, I mean doing, with your fake conversation?

 

you are doing what you claim others do?

 

If you are so hopeless, and those are your photos, it's because you've poisoned yourself with too much fat and too much sugar. You don't get enough D3.

 

you want a D5?

 

so why come here and post those too-close-for-comfort images claiming old-fag status?

 

"i've been here, and unhealthy, from the beginning"

 

not words in your mouth, a dialog I'm making up in my own mind trying to understand the purpose of your fake interaction and your inappropriately close to the face images posted in a giant size.

 

I can only come up with me insulting you by saying you are shills.

 

but maybe you are just discontented fat kids with a pour diet like the images imply.

 

'Hope'? destroyed?

a whole people are thus?

 

wow how powerful you delude your fake banter is.

Anonymous ID: 0a33e2 May 16, 2019, 8:06 a.m. No.6512767   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2791

>>6512691

I love that meme. Is that me in the back or am I suppose to be the Ben Rhodes guy in the front?

 

when I see that meme I think: someone is trolling me and giving me something like a ping on the back of the head in a loving way, like in 8th grade.

 

but seriously I'm 'no better' and 'exactly the same' that is correct. sounds like equality. And you too are 'no better' and 'exactly the same' even though you paid your way into being a 'lawfag' (where did you buy your degrees? thats me insulting you, furhter trolling on my part, buy you cast me either as a benrhodes type horizontal shirt guy or a winsome pepe in 8th grade)

 

now let's tell that to everyone that we are all equal and the same in what matters . . .

 

'part of the problem'?

 

then anyone and everyone is, at some time, part of that same problem.

 

let's see who else you attack with your 6 posts so far this bread:

>>6512542

 

>>6512702

"lawfag here"

 

What did Shakespeare say about lawyers? or did he have one of his characters say it?

 

so you are a lawfag and you tell me, because I mention that abortion is a third rail, and then troll that abortion is murder, that I am the problem?

 

how about this:

"parting out a new born for profit is murder"

is that a better talking point?

do people with that point of view constitute a 'problem'?

 

I don't really expect you to do anything more than attack me. You seem to be a one issue person.

 

Oh, and saying anon are akin to 'roaches'

You've got a really really positive outlook.

Anonymous ID: 0a33e2 May 16, 2019, 8:41 a.m. No.6512979   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6512791

I do not want to impose a view in the law.

my view about 'parting out' is an obvious verbal-bomb designed to make those who support full term abortion 'liberalization' seem to give the opinions monsters. I don't recommend anyone use that line in a verbal exchange.

 

another anon suggested yesterday or late last night that perhaps the Alabama law is an attempt by conservatives to quickly force the Abortion issue in the Supreme Court.

The issue is that no one wants a miscarriage, which happens early in a pregnancy, to be confused with an abortion, and then people jailed.

on the point about lawyers, and the need to review some of their credentials:

Probably most lawyers earned their degree. However we need to maybe review some of the credentials, and make them jump through one more hoop to weed out those who were special special frenz of the big big donors, and failed to learn the trade adequatly.

The Barry Soetoro's of the world should all have their credentials reevaluated. Maybe they learned something, even though they were put forward to the head of the class, and still can be effective in the trade. If so they should be able to continue no matter how they got into the school. But if it can be shown that not only did they get in with special treatment, but also failed to learn anything, and were handed a degree, then they should have their certification removed.