Anonymous ID: 73dc37 May 16, 2019, 9:32 a.m. No.6513327   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3351

anon bun: Necker Island(Richard Branson) Recon. continued.

>>6513002 lb-Necker Island Pics from lb # 8328

>>6513164

>>6513172

>>6513183

>>6513187

>>6513207

>>6513216

>>6513238

>>6513242

>>6513259

>>6513291

 

Re: cap #1

Regretting that bet now? Sir Richard Branson forced to dress as a stewardess after losing wager with Air-Asia chief

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2323292/Sir-Richard-Branson-dresses-drag-losing-bet-AirAsia-chief.html

Anonymous ID: 73dc37 May 16, 2019, 9:47 a.m. No.6513438   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3451 >>3561 >>3682 >>3715 >>3877

Both Comey And Brennan Voted Communist While Cold War Was Raging

 

The heads of Obama's FBI and CIA both voted for Communists during the Cold War, yet were somehow able to move up the ranks within the same US intelligence community that had spent decades fighting that very ideology.

Journalist Paul Sperry noted on Wednesday that former FBI Director James Comey admitted in a 2003 interview to having voted Communist before casting his ballot for Jimmy Carter in 1980.

"In college, I was left of center," Comey told New York Magazine, and through a gradual process I found myself more comfortable with a lot of the ideas and approaches the Republicans were using.” He voted for Carter in 1980, but in ’84, “I voted for Reagan—I’d moved from Communist to whatever I am now. I’m not even sure how to characterize myself politically. Maybe at some point, I’ll have to figure it out.”

 

Of note, Comey's wife and four daughters were all giant Hillary Clinton supporters who wanted her to win "really badly."

 

Former CIA Director John Brennan, meanwhile, admitted in 2016 to voting Communist in the 1970s. When asked at the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation's annual conference whether past activism would create a barrier for diverse candidates who want to enter the intelligence community, Brennan said that he was forced to admit to voting for Communist Gus Hall for president in 1976, according to CNN.

 

"I froze, because I was getting so close to coming into CIA and said, 'OK, here's the choice, John. You can deny that, and the machine is probably going to go, you know, wacko, or I can acknowledge it and see what happens," CNN quoted Brennan as saying.

 

Brennan (who was sworn in as CIA director on a draft of the US Constitution, without the Bill of Rights, instead of a Bible) said that while he had voted Communist, he wasn't an official member of the Communist Party - and was relieved that he had been accepted into the CIA.

 

"I said I was neither Democratic or Republican, but it was my way, as I was going to college, of signaling my unhappiness with the system, and the need for change. I said I'm not a member of the Communist Party, so the polygrapher looked at me and said, 'OK,' and when I was finished with the polygraph and I left and said, 'Well, I'm screwed.'"

 

"So if back in 1980, John Brennan was allowed to say, 'I voted for the Communist Party with Gus Hall' … and still got through, rest assured that your rights and your expressions and your freedom of speech as Americans is something that's not going to be disqualifying of you as you pursue a career in government," the former CIA Director concluded.

So Two of President Obama's spy chiefs voted Communist, while Obama was influenced by the likes of radicals Bill Ayers, Saul Alinsky and his pastor - Jeremiah 'God damn America' Wright. Weeks before he died of a sudden heart attack at the age of 43, journalist Andrew Breitbart claimed to have a videos that would expose Obama as a communist radical.

None of the above sounds very "America First".

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-16/both-comey-and-brennan-both-voted-communist-while-cold-war-was-raging

Anonymous ID: 73dc37 May 16, 2019, 10:03 a.m. No.6513546   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Pacific Investment Mgmt sold shares in Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings-Owned by iHeart Media

 

Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. is an outdoor advertising company. The Company provides clients with advertising opportunities through billboards, street furniture displays, transit displays and other out-of-home advertising displays, such as wallscapes and spectaculars. Its segments include Americas outdoor advertising (Americas) and International outdoor advertising (International). The Americas segment consists of operations primarily in the United States, Canada and Latin America. Its Americas assets consist of printed and digital billboards, street furniture and transit displays, airport displays and wallscapes and other spectaculars, which the Company owns or operates under lease management agreements. International segment primarily includes operations in Europe and Asia. The International assets consist of street furniture and transit displays, billboards, mall displays, Smartbike programs, and other spectaculars, which the Company owns or operates under lease agreements.

https://www.marketscreener.com/CLEAR-CHANNEL-OUTDOOR-HOL-12004/company/

 

iHeartMedia

iHeartMedia, Inc. is a diversified media and entertainment company. The Company specializes in broadcast radio, digital, out-of-home, mobile, live events and on-demand information services for national audiences and local communities while providing a range of opportunities for advertisers. It operates through three segments: iHeartMedia (iHM), Americas outdoor advertising (Americas outdoor) and International outdoor advertising (International outdoor). Its iHM segment provides media and entertainment services through broadcast and digital delivery, and also includes its national syndication business. Its Americas outdoor and International outdoor segments provide outdoor advertising services in their respective geographic regions using various digital and printed display types. Its other category includes its full-service media representation business,

Katz Media Group (Katz Media), as well as other general support services.

https://www.marketscreener.com/IHEARTMEDIA-INC-17946400/company/

 

https://www.secform4.com/insider-trading/1334978.htm

Anonymous ID: 73dc37 May 16, 2019, 10:44 a.m. No.6513789   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3877

Five more US states sue Purdue Pharma over its role in opioid crisis

Wisconsin, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland and West Virginia join several dozen other states, alleging company pushed false claims such as ‘we sell hope in a bottle’.

Five more US states sued painkiller maker Purdue Pharma on Thursday, alleging misconduct in the marketing and sales of opioids such as the company’s highly-profitable OxyContin narcotic.

 

Wisconsin, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland and West Virginia filed separate but similar lawsuits, bringing the number of states suing the pharmaceutical company to 45, over its alleged role in the US opioids crisis that has caused thousands of drug overdose deaths. Pennsylvania sued the company two days ago, while New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art on Wednesday joined a host of cultural and academic institutions in announcing it would stop accepting philanthropy from the Sackler family members behind Purdue Pharma.

 

The five states that filed on Thursday are also suing Richard Sackler, who was previously Purdue’s co-chairman and president and is one of the leading members of the Sackler family who wholly own the private company.

 

Sackler has been sued in several other such lawsuits in recent months and Purdue is also being sued by more than 1,500 cities and counties from all across the US.

 

West Virginia’s lawsuit alleges Purdue Pharma aggressively pushed false claims and deceptive practices, even in the past training new marketing employees with the advertising motto: “We sell hope in a bottle.”

 

“This lawsuit reveals many years of painstaking investigation,” West Virginia’s attorney general, Patrick Morrisey, said. “The senseless death and ruined lives of untold thousands must stop.”

 

Purdue Pharma and Richard Sackler have repeatedly and strenuously denied the allegations in the various lawsuits against them, and all wrongdoing.

 

In Wisconsin, opioids cost 916 lives in the state in 2017, the state’s suit said.

 

“The opioid epidemic has shattered lives and strained communities across the state and the country,” said Wisconsin’s attorney general Josh Kaul. “Today, we filed suit … alleging that they misled the public and medical professionals about both the benefits of and the dangers posed by OxyContin and other opioids, and that the opioid epidemic is partly attributable to their conduct.”

Wisconsin’s lawsuit, filed in Dane county circuit court, seeks a permanent injunction, abatement of the public nuisance, and civil penalties. It alleges that the corporate entities Purdue Pharma LP and Purdue Pharma Inc, and Sackler repeatedly made false and deceptive claims regarding opioids, including OxyContin.

 

Purdue Pharma’s deceptive and false marketing created a shift in the understanding of the effectiveness and danger of opioids, the complaint alleges. “In order to combat the concerns about opioids being abused, Purdue deployed an aggressive marketing campaign that sought to increase sales of OxyContin, while changing the accepted norms about opioid prescribing.”

 

The Wisconsin complaint further alleges that, after a 2007 settlement in a federal criminal case against Purdue and some of its leading executives, in a case that did not include any charges against any members of the Sackler family, Purdue continued to engage in false, deceptive, and misleading marketing practices in relation to its prescription painkiller.

 

It depended on key influencers, aggressive sales representatives and “patient advocacy” websites, in order to downplay the dangers associated with OxyContin and other opioids. Those risks, as outlined in the complaint, include the risk of addiction, the ease of preventing addiction, the benefits of Purdue’s opioids relative to other opioids or pain relievers, the efficacy of opioids, the ability to control the effects of withdrawal and the risk to senior citizens.

 

Kaul alleges that Purdue and Richard Sackler were fully aware of the potential profits of OxyContin.

 

OxyContin was launched in the mid-90s as a breakthrough in pain relief, because of its formula for controlled, sustained release of its active ingredient, which is derived from the opium poppy.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/may/16/purdue-pharma-states-sue-opioids-crisis-role