Anonymous ID: 55dbc0 May 16, 2019, 11:23 a.m. No.6514030   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4085

>>6513962

"Cooperating Witness" Does that mean they just go there of their own will and say whatever they want [other than what the FBI tells them to shut up about]

In other words, no subpoena, of their own free will, still employees of USA Fed.

So they believe it is just "an investigation" the purpose of which would be reform, and have no idea - have not been told, of any criminal investigations into what they are being asked about?

Anonymous ID: 55dbc0 May 16, 2019, 11:49 a.m. No.6514211   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4230 >>4305 >>4353 >>4443 >>4610

>>6514122

I have to re-read Constitution.

""No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

 

Crux is definition of "Natural Born"

I looked it up before in old dictionaries and Natural Born means you don't have to be legitimate i.e. your parents don't have to have been married. But you, yourself, must be born in the U.S.A. .

maybe they changed it over the years, but that was the original requirement.

Remember in those days there was much less travel. So whereever you were born with in the States. you'd likely have the emotional alligence to, i.e. You Home is the Land of the USA.

Not like you were born here and brought up in France or whereever, as the case could easily be today.

Travel was not as easy then.

If you were brought up in a Military Religious Cult which took part in a C-A [not a natural born Agency] bloody coup in the Phillipines; ah,

I don't think you qualify, in the spirirt of the law, for "natural born" USA

Your allegiance is 'International" in that case.

Anonymous ID: 55dbc0 May 16, 2019, 12:25 p.m. No.6514474   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6514239

> "Crazy from Tantraโ€™s spread."

Interesting. The word 'Tantra" itself means "to spread' The reference is to a body of scriptures. Not all the same

Tantra is not one school. It's not mind - control. Any more than pure Christianity is mind-control. It's how it used that's make it "mind control" and evil or not, as the case may be.

There are many schools of "Tantra'

also the description of the Dalai Lama [C-A] cult reminds me of the Dem Trump hater fanatics. The ones under "Trump Delusion syndrome" They use the same shame tactics and are successful with irrationality via lying and bullying. Maybe it's the same playbook.

For sure Hussain used NLP like Raniere did / does.

https://www.learnreligions.com/what-is-tantra-1770612

https://www.rocketlawyer.com/article/us-constitution-full-text.rl#A2Sec1

The popularization of the word "Tantra" has obscured its meaning.

Bluntly, if you hear the word used loosely you can be sure the communicator is ignorant of what they are talking about.

For example, The "dark" Tantra practices are nothing to be trivialized. As they are made benign or tamed; as a kind of sex recreation or porn.

""Tantra" is a scripture. And there are many.

Many schools.

see attached.

Some prescribe ritual sacrifices? Or for sure rituals at graveyards. I think also you can't learn it from the texts. If you do get a teacher of the dark side version. Don't do it! They are not easy to find and if you do find one, run.

Anonymous ID: 55dbc0 May 16, 2019, 12:46 p.m. No.6514618   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4631

>>6514420

especially since beanz is one?

I got this screen shot from the vid.

Only one who didn't look like the rest of the family image only.

Frens?

As with the earlier photo? Looks like the Beanz was raised from childhood for her role, with all the other Crisis Actor / life-time Actor crew.

Think of the death-fakers; why do they always get roles as Political commentators / truthers?

Regular normies don't even rate political commentary as that important , right?

Maybe why 8ch is more important than it would seem?