Last

>>6514067

Hitlery twats a MUH emails twat?

She's the queen of the shills. She of all people can't use that.

However interesting it is, it is shtupid.

All she does with this twat is to make CONCRETE that that she just can't Troll.

Look Hitlery, this twat has put you in a mutually exclusive, binary Schoedengers box. Either what Comey did was a crime and therefore what you did is far worse. and you in fact know this is the case re: your actions. Otherwise what Comey did is lawful, as he sent no classified data. This does not apply to you which would be patently obvious. Since this scenario, Comey innocent, necessarily requires no classified, if this is the live cat, then it puts a bright spot light on you.

Don't drink and Twat Hitlery. Drunk tweating never ends well.

>>6514713

Tanks Bakes

>>6514788

>3. They are not known for being innovative, creative thinkers. They know this. They are struggling to overcome this.

>

>4. Part of #3 is rooted in Communism, top down, control mindset. Autocratic.

Been trying for thousand of years. Their ancient and deep philosophical underpinnings re gov/politics/social control praise the Great Leader and a corrupt in bred beuaracracy that inherently believes thinking outside of the box is criminal, seditious, treasonous. Me thinks the train is closing on a hairpin curve in the mountains with no way to slow down.

>>6514863

>The movies jumped the shark when Cumberbatch was the villain.

Well you have a bunch of correct facts there but they don't lead to that conclusion.

The problem was that Cumberbatch played Kahn As in Wrath of. As in the best Star Trek movie bar none. Which is why from Star Trek Vi on every fucking movie was a variant of Wrath of Kahn.

>>6514907

>Why is 98% of every movie about aliens make them look like blood thirsty killers?

SciFi in the movies has always been a tough sell, despite SciFi leterature's centuries of respect and sales.

For Hallloween in 1938, a radio station broadcast a radio play of HG Wells War of the Worlds which leaned heavily on the talent of Orson Wells. While not a movie it was HUGE for its time

In the 1950's and into the 60's SciFi became THE favored platform for people to discuss thorny social issues, advanced technologies and NUKES, the OTHER, and Soviet attack. With notable exceptions, like Forbiden Planet, where the monster wasn't an alien but rather an Ego monster created by ancient technology built by an advanced alien race.

The planet's director, an egomaniacal scientist in search of glory, attempted to use this technology. In his hubris he exposed the machine to his evil ego or ID. The machine created the monster for reasons of its own, and the monster would attack that which caused the director fear and anger.

Most were along the lines of "The evil space monster that conquers the world." They had tiny budgets. B Movies for the drive ins. They are unwatchable crap, but had evil monster aliens who come here for herder reasons. like monopolizing the trade of underpants.

In the 60's 2001's special effects and the Apollo program made respectable SciFi acheivable. When the monster returned to the limelight in 1979's Alien, it was with a twist. The story was an old horror trope, the haunted house/possessed house.

Hell more recently, the aliens were portrayed as nothing more than unpleasant, stupid, illegal aliens, in South Africa. Movie name escapes me.

>>6514907

>>6514925

>>6514959

You two are morans.

Star Trek was cancelled before the lunar landing. Afterwards, Star Trek's popularity in syndication exploded. Paramount responded with a Star Trek animated series with the original cast. Round about 1977, Paramount began production for a new original cast TV series of some sort when an out of nowhere B movie called Star Wars hit the theaters.

In any event Star Trek was supposed to be what Next Generation is. The original had to be reworked from its pilot episode. It's most appropriately Star Socialists, but that's another tale