ASK YOURSELF A QUESTION

Where do all the "anons" come from?

4chan /pol/ SWARMS with "anons" vigorously outputting miserable "chan" noises all day long…

BUT, there are SO MANY of these"anons" that not only the 4chan /pol/ ones churn furiously along nonstop, but ALSO 8chan /pol/ is so vibrant and virulent with its own “anons” THAT IT IS IMPLICATED IN SHOOTINGS we are hearing about in the news…

So while 4chan, already– which used to be about 'anonymous' hacktivism (which disappeared)– gets "taken over by neo-nazi anons", there are still then enough “anons” left over TO FILL A WHOLE NOTHER SPAZZY /POL/ ON 8CHAN…

So many!

And yet…

Now we come to /QRESEARCH…

And lo and behold!

There are SO MANY busy, repetitive, relentlessly productive “anons” THAT THEY FILL THIS BOARD UP THIS BOARD TOO!

The “anons” here post a slightly modified version of what they post on /pol/– but clearly the same basic template is followed…

Wow, that's a lot “anons” staying very busy all day and all night!

So many that they not only fill up two /pols/ with a frenzy of tedious, toxic crap, but they FEEL COMPELLED TO REPRODUCE THE EXACT SAME THING HERE.

With vague occasional reference to Q– but often COMPLETELY CONTRADICTING Q…

So ask yourself one simple question:

WHERE ARE ALL THESE "ANONS" COMING FROM?

USE LOGIC

Was the internet allowed to be/stay organic?

Or was control sought?

If control were sought, did it succeed?

If control were sought and the effort failed, then we would have noticed the consequences of that failure…

No such thing happened.

Therefore, either the internet is controlled, or NO ONE EVER TRIED TO CONTROL IT.

Hmmm, what do you think is most likely?

Think

Why is /Qresearch JUST ANOTHER /POL/ FACSIMILE?

Does that smell organic?

Will humans EVER wake up and fight?

And to be clear: it is not just the 'toxic' stuff that is emulated: ALMOST ALL POSTS ARE EMULATED. By design. Total control of what is posted means total control of narrative.

Q is waiting for people to wake up and fight.

Q can't tell us.

We must choose to reject the fakeness.

Our free will must be totally free.

Wake up people.

>>6520040

Stop saying 'twats'.

THE JOKE IS OLD AND DEAD.

Humans understand how to not beat jokes to death.

Fake "anons" cling to worn out lingo.

What are "anons"?

Why is there a mechanical, repetitive, unnatural staleness to their lingo?

WHY IS "CHAN CULTURE" STUCK IN PLACE?

Why is chan culture spinning its wheels, and not growing?

BETTER YET, why is chan culture EXACTLY THE SAME AS IT WAS THREE YEARS AGO?

Culture changes MOST when politics and events change most– yet "chan culture" has STOPPED CHANGING precisely when events HAVE CHANGED MOST.

Very unnatural

Q should have initiated a whole new era of "chan culture"

Instead, "chan culture" became ABSOLUTELY FROZEN IN PLACE, and got spewed out in a non-stop frenzy of activity, at Q.

THINK PEOPLE, IS THIS NATURAL?

Q is waiting for PEOPLE to wake up and figure out that "anons" ARE NOT PEOPLE.

We are being duped.

=Q can't tell us, because we must choose freely to reject.==

So wake up people.

Wake up please.

>>6520069

Having "anons" respond in the ways does not improve the artificial image of this board.

You can fool people into thinking "anons" are real and act like this as long as the illusion chugs along unchallenged, but when more functional humans challenge you, and you can't respond like actual humans, but rather defensively spew forth more of stale and pointless emulated /pol/ posts, then you are doing yourself no favors.

PEOPLE ARE WAKING UP.

Stop forcing fake /pol/ here.

Stop forcing a deception.

Your time is up.

We reject you.

So stop and get out.

Bye.

>>6520085

Answer the pic anon.

Can you?

Why can't "anons" read text in images?

This anon, likely, can't.

Some can, but they are rare.

ALL HUMANS THAT CAN READ TEXT IN NORMAL POSTS, CAN READ TEXT IN IMAGES.

But most "anons" can't.

What does this tell us?

THINK.

This isn't a game– why is Q posting here?

If "anons" CAN'T READ TEXT IN IMAGES, and we have figured what that means, what, in turn, does the fact that Q posts here tell us?

You can lead a horse to water…

Q is waiting for us to DRINK

He can't spoon it to us.

We must CHOOSE FREELY to reject deception.

WAKE UP PEOPLE

>>6520100

Fake "anon", stop posting.

"One of us" MAKES NO SENSE.

This isn't /pol/, fake "anon".

FIGURE IT OUT.

The "us" of this board should be PATRIOTS, not "anons"

And I am NOT indiciting "chan culture"– I am indicting FAKE, EMULATED CULTURE.

THIS BOARD RECYCLES STALE CULTURE THAT NEVER WOULD HAVE NATURALLY FORMED HERE.

It's a stupid illusion.

Way too much activity.

Again: THIS ISN'T /POL/.

If so many "anons" were organically swarming on THIS board, then /pol/ on 4chan, and /pol/ on 8chan (and whatever other identical boards are out there engaged in the same frenzy) would have COLLAPSED, because all the "anons" came here.

HOW DID "ANONS" MULTIPLY THEMSELVES TWO YEARS AGO?

We know, fake "anon".

You can't fake it because you don't know how.

Indefinite recycling and strict enforcement of tired, tedious, and irrelevant "chan culture" LOOKS VERY VERY FAKE.

I am not lying to you.

I understand you are too limited to grasp what a shoddy illusion this is, so I am telling you the truth.

Stop posting and get out.

Get the fuck out now.

Don't talk back.

Shut up, shut down, and get out.

Do it now.

>>6520133

If I am a human, and I speak my mind, then I speak for at least one human.

If I am the only human speaking, the BY DEFAULT, I am expressing the human perspective that happens to be available on this board.

You can't dispute that.

If any other humans would WAKE UP and SPEAK UP, then, of course, their input is equal to mine.

Understand fake "anon"?

Try to think, because everything you do is stupid.

You don't have consent to keep forcing this lie.

Ask.

Why don't you?

Coward.

Shut up now.

Shut up and get out.

If you were not intent on violating our free will, you would disclose and get real consent.

You refuse, so now you must go.

I know your little wills are weak, so crumble and flee coward(s).

Go.

Shut up and go.

Meanwhile– does a single human here DEFEND you?

No.

Figure it out fake "anons".

You have to go now.

So shut up and go.

FAKE ANONS

You claim I can't speak for humans?

Then show me ONE HUMAN here that defends you.

Where is that human?

I'll wait…

>>6520195

Get out fake "anon".

Just get out.

Fake "chan" banter won't help this board less fake, and your inability to portray ANYTHING other than an "anon" dooms you.

So stop posting.

Stop posting.

Your big mistake is the posts.

The fake posts.

Stop and get out.

See, it's easy!

Bye.

>>6520220

Filler posts

THIS ISN'T /POL/!

Why do "anons" swarm around pretending this is /pol/?

Did /pol/ pick itself up when Q made a board, and decide that /pol/ had relocated, and that the point of Q was that /pol/ would multiply, double itself, and reproduce a steady stream of /pol/ type material?

WHY WOULD THAT HAPPEN IN THE REAL WORLD?

HINT: it would not.

FAKE "ANONS" CONTROL THIS BOARD BY EMULATING /POL/

Because this is a STUPID illusion, you would think people would wake up.

But apparently, people believe "this is the chans, and those crazy spastic "anons" are here!"

But no.

There can't possibly be enough "anons" to create all the "anon" posts!

And THEY HAVE NO FUCKING REASON TO DO IT HERE.

Q is waiting for humans to WAKE UP AND QUESTION THIS.

Q can't feed it into our mouths.

WE MUST WAKE UP AND FIGURE IT OUT.

Given how STUPID it is, we should be able to.

Wake up people.