Anonymous ID: 2b5ae9 May 17, 2019, 12:33 p.m. No.6522809   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2866

>>6522787

Would be really interesting to know. I did some useability testing for Boeing in the 90s and know they traditionally were pretty oriented towards letting pilots have more control of the plane (as opposed to AirBus, which preferred to let the plane have more control).

 

So this malfunction–which appears to arise out of pilots not having sufficient control to prevent the crash–is a strange one for a company like Boeing. Unless it's changed a lot (or unless it somehow did not realize the implications of the new MCAS software because it was farmed out).

Anonymous ID: 2b5ae9 May 17, 2019, 12:41 p.m. No.6522866   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3082

>>6522809

>>6522787

 

In the tweet below, the opinion is put forth (purportedly expert) that it's not the software that caused the problem.

 

https://moneymaven.io/mishtalk/economics/boeing-737-max-major-design-flaws-not-a-software-failure-rVjJZBVzZkuZLkDJn3Jy8A/

 

Scanning the literature, the info still seems sketchy–like they are trying to make it sound like they know moar than they really do. Or they knowmoar than they are willing to disclose so far.