>>6523385 pb

>Microwaves are of some concern because they can cause water molecules to spin, which heats them, but we're already swimming in that shit.

^^THIS

So, you knowingly admit that we're already exposed to the dangers of microwave radiation and that it's not good.

So adding another form of that same radiation (on an entirely different level)- in the public space, is acceptable?

First of all, the FCC REFUSES to engage the public about what 5G really does, what it really is.

Bill Clinton made it impossible to stop the FCC back in the 90's when he approved legislation. Read: the FCC is unstoppable.

You trust this? What data do you use to trust? The data supplied by those who want you dead? Data that comes from the un-accountable FCC?

Test sites in the UK show horrid affects on the population. Read those?

Anons don't need info or data from these people / agencies but rather common fuking sense. One is bad, moar is ok? Dayum Anon. Thought you said you had some background in this. Do you have any common sense?

WWG1WGA

>>6523571

>>6523376 pb

>google spacex and satellites, also virgin is getting in on the act

Here we go again.

So trust SpaceX, trust Gargle, trust Branson?

Are you fuking kidding me?

Have done the research. Choose different sources than Richard Branson however. Every single biz you mentioned is a FOR PROFIT biz. They wouldn't lie to further their agenda for financial gain, would they?

THINK Anons!

>>6523621

Moar for ya pic related