>>6524222 (lb)

do we know if that non-anon IP hops? 16 hrs difference in the posts

there have been cases of mistaken bans due to the shared IP pool of VPNs

I see a problem here with the possibility of a comp'd baker assuming control of the kitchen unknown to anons

, and possibly unknown to the BVs (not being one I cannot say what data they have)

been wondering when this very predictable threat would occur, and now…

what solutions are available and viable

>>6524322

>>6524733

>>6524775

the use of a pastebin account to verify a baker's history is a good idea.

It's the best that has been proposed so far and it's been used for months by some.

Subversive baker's are more dangerous than most realize.

>>6524782

I just wish I had that much energy

>>6524894