Muddy waters.
World is over leveraged. When the band aid can't be found it will be ugly make 2007 look like a dream.
China only has rules to protect Chinese inside country anyone outside it is take your money and what are you going to do? All business is war and China wants to rule the world.
VLO
Anon's for those who understand this, they are the ones it is aimed at. :)
In this world you can call it good verse evil battle or in High brow local you would be better off using Philosophy. The Black hats are in this club Rhetoric.
Say it over and over and it becomes the truth you want, control the media and they do the work that the education system misses.
Aristotle[edit]
Aristotle stresses that rhetoric is closely related to dialectic. He offers several formulas to describe this affinity between the two disciplines: first of all, rhetoric is said to be a “counterpart” (antistrophos) to dialectic (Rhet. I.1, 1354a1); (ii) it is also called an “outgrowth” (paraphues ti) of dialectic and the study of character (Rhet. I.2, 1356a25f.); finally, Aristotle says that rhetoric is part of dialectic and resembles it (Rhet. I.2, 1356a30f.). In saying that rhetoric is a counterpart to dialectic, Aristotle obviously alludes to Plato's Gorgias (464bff.), where rhetoric is ironically defined as a counterpart to cookery in the soul. Since, in this passage, Plato uses the word ‘antistrophos’ to designate an analogy, it is likely that Aristotle wants to express a kind of analogy too: what dialectic is for the (private or academic) practice of attacking and maintaining an argument, rhetoric is for the (public) practice of defending oneself or accusing an opponent. The analogy to dialectic has important implications for the status of rhetoric. Plato argued in his Gorgias that rhetoric cannot be an art (technê), since it is not related to a definite subject, while real arts are defined by their specific subjects, as e.g. medicine or shoemaking are defined by their products, i.e., health and shoes.
The WHITE HATS
Socratic-Find the Truth.
The method is largely destructive, in that false belief is exposed[8] and only constructive in that this exposure may lead to further search for truth.
Socratic (They killed Socrates this is not a keyboard this war)
The Socratic dialogues are a particular form of dialectic known as the method of elenchus (literally, "refutation, scrutiny"[7]) whereby a series of questions clarifies a more precise statement of a vague belief, logical consequences of that statement are explored, and a contradiction is discovered. The method is largely destructive, in that false belief is exposed[8] and only constructive in that this exposure may lead to further search for truth. The detection of error does not amount to a proof of the antithesis; for example, a contradiction in the consequences of a definition of piety does not provide a correct definition. The principal aim of Socratic activity may be to improve the soul of the interlocutors, by freeing them from unrecognized errors; or indeed, by teaching them the spirit of inquiry.
In common cases, Socrates used enthymemes as the foundation of his argument.[citation needed]
For example, in the Euthyphro, Socrates asks Euthyphro to provide a definition of piety. Euthyphro replies that the pious is that which is loved by the gods. But, Socrates also has Euthyphro agreeing that the gods are quarrelsome and their quarrels, like human quarrels, concern objects of love or hatred. Therefore, Socrates reasons, at least one thing exists that certain gods love but other gods hate. Again, Euthyphro agrees. Socrates concludes that if Euthyphro's definition of piety is acceptable, then there must exist at least one thing that is both pious and impious (as it is both loved and hated by the gods)—which Euthyphro admits is absurd. Thus, Euthyphro is brought to a realization by this dialectical method that his definition of piety is not sufficiently meaningful.
For example, in Plato's Gorgias, dialectic occurs between Socrates, the Sophist Gorgias, and two men, Polus and Callicles. Because Socrates' ultimate goal was to reach true knowledge, he was even willing to change his own views in order to arrive at the truth. The fundamental goal of dialectic, in this instance, was to establish a precise definition of the subject (in this case, rhetoric) and with the use of argumentation and questioning, make the subject even more precise. In the Gorgias, Socrates reaches the truth by asking a series of questions and in return, receiving short, clear answers.
There is another interpretation of the dialectic, as a method of intuition suggested in The Republic.[9] Simon Blackburn writes that the dialectic in this sense is used to understand "the total process of enlightenment, whereby the philosopher is educated so as to achieve knowledge of the supreme good, the Form of the Good"
How far to take this as the rock solid truth. When all that you have seen and read becomes so overwhelming that it can't be anything else.
Always remember that Fred Trump POTUS Father was a Dialectic and follower of Hegelian Dialectic. If you didn't know both the Trump Family and the Heinz family are from the same location in Germany. It has been predicted that Trump will solve the Block in German Philosophy Idealism that has been a block for over a 100 years. Now that would be an interesting lecture for Anons.
Hegelian dialectic, usually presented in a threefold manner, was stated by Heinrich Moritz Chalybäus[26] as comprising three dialectical stages of development: a thesis, giving rise to its reaction; an antithesis, which contradicts or negates the thesis; and the tension between the two being resolved by means of a synthesis. In more simplistic terms, one can consider it thus: problem → reaction → solution. Although this model is often named after Hegel, he himself never used that specific formulation. Hegel ascribed that terminology to Kant.[27] Carrying on Kant's work, Fichte greatly elaborated on the synthesis model and popularized it.
Have my own books for you to know wiki was for ease in this platform. Don't be telling me what I cut and pasted was not accurate. I only took what I took for a reason. You pips you want wonky photos of book pages that all scream you can't read????????????
Friday night, Late night!
Waiting for a girl like YOU!
>>>6526274
The Wisdom of God
18 For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who [m]are perishing, but to us who [n]are being saved it is the power of God. 19 For it is written,
“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise,
And the cleverness of the clever I will set aside.”
20 Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? 21 For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not come to know God, God was well-pleased through the foolishness of the [o]message preached to save those who believe. 22 For indeed Jews ask for [p]signs and Greeks search for wisdom; 23 but we preach [q]Christ crucified, to Jews a stumbling block and to Gentiles foolishness, 24 but to those who are the called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. 25 Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.
26 For [r]consider your calling, brethren, that there were not many wise according to [s]the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble; 27 but God has chosen the foolish things of the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to shame the things which are strong, 28 and the base things of the world and the despised God has chosen, the things that are not, so that He may nullify the things that are, 29 so that no [t]man may boast before God. 30 But [u]by His doing you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, [v]and righteousness and sanctification, and redemption, 31 so that, just as it is written, “Let him who boasts, boast in the Lord.”
V
You know and I know that these guys are fronts and the real money is the Cabal that is big in Kuwait. They are the ones who set up the mining company deal with Iran to help sell oil around USA embargo. We all know that there are a ton of these next tear. Just waiting with baited breath to replace the zucks and twits and bebos etc etc. How do you think Warren Buffet the "wizard" of Wall Street made his billions that the cabal uses. Obama stopped in Omaha several times to have lunch and pick up a check. It is all about getting their sick evil profits out of the sick evil they do into the system.
No all those that I know are here and are working and doing their own digs like we always did long before you or Q was ever here. I hate to be like real obvious but see how slow then boom a bread flys by. When something important pops up or drops everyone tunes in. You need to learn more.