Anons,

Some brilliant research by 40 HEAD on Twatter.

Seems research has taken a back seat to memes and Jew shills here so let us revel in some outstanding research pertaining to changes that POTUS has made to the military code as related to military tribunals ad the coming arrests. I will post his tweets and the link to the Twitter. So c`mon autists, start doing what you do best and start researching again. The shit hat has been appearing here lately is CRAP This is an 85 tweet thread and, as far as I am concerned, required reading for anons. Full tweet thread here: https://twitter.com/40_head/status/1129608273248759808

I sometimes wonder what it's like for those who find something so meaningful that it actually becomes a Q proof? Well, @americanlll and @mastersshelby and I may have done just that. I posted recently asking, are we being weaned by Q?

https://twitter.com/40_head/status/1128992652236660736

1. #FutureProvesPast. I decided to start at the beginning of the Q drops until I found something that triggered me. Guess how far I made it? All the way to #2! Ready to love your @POTUS even more, reaffirm your trust that Q is REAL, and, that we are right to #TrustThePlan!

1. There are two sections I want to look at specifically in drop #2.

https://t.co/BvVNeI3mwR

"Who has ultimate authority over our branches of military w\o approval conditions unless 90+ in wartime conditions? What is the military code?"

1. And, the second section I want to look at is:

"POTUS knew removing criminal rogue elements as a first step was essential to free and pass legislation.

Who has access to everything classified?"

1. So, "Who has ultimate authority over our branches of military w\o approval conditions unless 90+ in wartime conditions?

What is the military code? "

We know the president is the Commander In Chief, meaning he has the ultimate power to wield the military at his discretion.

1. The only real limitation he has is the requirement to notify congress within 48 hours that he has deployed the military. And, if troops are placed into combat situations, they may remain there up to 90 days before there MUST be a declaration of war by congress.

1. Otherwise, the president is supposed to pull the troops back or face impeachment. You are more than welcome to peruse the pages of the Title 50 US Code section 33 to verify my summation.

https://t.co/tX02yDY4lm

So, what exactly is the military code? Is it Title 50? Well, no.

1. That's not related to the military besides the ability to use it. What about the radio call signs? You know, the phonetic alphabet. Alpha, Bravo, Charlie, Delta, Echo…etc. Many in QAnon believed this, along with common military acronyms might be the code Q asks about.

1. But, I would venture to say MOST people, especially us veterans, immediately thought about the UCMJ. The Uniform Code of Military Justice. That damned rule book that haunted every service member. It is the equivalent to State or Federal law, but applies to the military and…

1. …certain civilians who are contracted by or employed by the military and the Department of Defense.

When I first covered this Q drop months ago, I went with what most veterans were saying. The UCMJ was the obvious choice as I'm a veteran. But, not this time around.

1. Re-reading this drop with the concept in mind that "You have more than you know" and "We have it all", I believe there's something more to this.

You see, we're looking at military tribunals, hoping for military arrests of the traitorous assholes, right?

1. The SCOTUS decisions are what most Anons point to as precedent for the military trying civilians. BUT, what about the document that provides the UCMJ its authority? Here is the MCM, the Manual for Courts-Martial. A 772 page document of "light reading"

https://t.co/8WrKQmAoG9

1. This document is something very special. You see, this document covers all military law, its application AND its jurisdiction. A unique attribute of this document, is that it is often edited by the President of the United States. No other individual has that authority.

1. And, every president HAS altered it at some point since 1984 when the right to alter it was granted to the sitting president. Now it is governed, explained, and its contents defined by, The Joint Service Committee on Military Justice (JSC)

https://t.co/uUsIFXYFKo

Trump Backs Bid To Strike Down New York City Gun Laws At Supreme Court

The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to strike down a New York City ordinance strictly regulating the transportation of firearms.

The ordinance at issue prohibits licensed gun owners from transporting weapons to any location, save one of seven authorized gun ranges. License holders are not permitted to take their firearms beyond city limits.

“To confine a weapon to the home is thus to preclude the owner from using it for many of the purposes that the right to keep and bear arms is meant to serve,” Solicitor General Noel Francisco told the justices in court papers.

The plaintiffs are Second Amendment activists who wish to transport their firearms outside the city to participate in shooting competitions and defend their vacation homes. A federal trial judge and the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the regulations, prompting an appeal to the Supreme Court. The 2nd Circuit said the transport ban protects “the public safety of both license-holding and non-license-holding citizens.”

The case is the first gun rights dispute the justices have heard in almost a decade.

In a brief supporting the plaintiffs, Francisco compared New York’s ordinance with federal statutes governing the movement and possession of firearms. Though federal law bars minors from possessing guns and bans firearms in school zones, those prohibitions do not apply to people transporting unloaded weapons in locked containers in the course of completing some lawful activity like hunting. (RELATED: Forget Alabama. These Abortion Cases Are In Front Of The Supreme Court Right Now)

“The city’s ban subjects adults to more severe restrictions than Congress considered necessary for children, and it subjects the entire city to more severe restrictions than Congress considered necessary for school zones,” Francisco wrote.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/17/trump-guns-supreme-court/?utm_campaign=atdailycaller&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter

>>6527072

Cuck on a gelding…….

Perfect…….

No balls on either……

This faggot globalist prick needs to be replaced…. Government is corrupt as fuck and he has fundamentally changed this wonderful nation into a Euro style multicultural shithole in less than 4 years… Hijabs everywhere… And he has essentially shut down our energy industry putting over 135,000 people out of work, gaslighting on 2 pipeline projects to get Alberta oil to tidewater and on to Asia and world markets while running bills to the Canadian taxpayer of over 3 grand a month for his organic vegan diet. Lord help us if he gets in for another term…..