ASK YOURSELF A QUESTION

Where do all the "anons" come from?

4chan /pol/ SWARMS with "anons" vigorously outputting miserable "chan" noises all day long…

BUT, there are SO MANY of these"anons" that not only the 4chan /pol/ ones churn furiously along nonstop, but ALSO 8chan /pol/ is so vibrant and virulent with its own “anons” THAT IT IS IMPLICATED IN SHOOTINGS we are hearing about in the news…

So while 4chan, already– which used to be about 'anonymous' hacktivism (which disappeared)– gets "taken over by neo-nazi anons", there are still then enough “anons” left over TO FILL A WHOLE NOTHER SPAZZY /POL/ ON 8CHAN…

So many!

And yet…

Now we come to /QRESEARCH…

And lo and behold!

There are SO MANY busy, repetitive, relentlessly productive “anons” THAT THEY FILL THIS BOARD UP TOO!

The “anons” here post a slightly modified version of what they post on /pol/– but clearly the same basic template is followed…

Wow, that's a lot “anons” staying very busy all day and all night!

So many that they not only fill up two /pols/ with a frenzy of tedious, toxic crap, but they FEEL COMPELLED TO REPRODUCE THE EXACT SAME THING HERE.

With vague occasional reference to Q– but often COMPLETELY CONTRADICTING Q…

So ask yourself one simple question:

WHERE ARE ALL THESE "ANONS" COMING FROM?

USE LOGIC

Was the internet allowed to be/stay organic?

Or was control sought?

If control were sought, did it succeed?

If control were sought and the effort failed, then we would have noticed the consequences of that failure…

No such thing happened.

Therefore, either the internet is controlled, or NO ONE EVER TRIED TO CONTROL IT.

Hmmm, what do you think is most likely?

Think

Why is /Qresearch JUST ANOTHER /POL/ FACSIMILE?

Does that smell organic?

Will humans EVER wake up and fight?

And to be clear: it is not just the 'toxic' stuff that is emulated: ALMOST ALL POSTS ARE EMULATED. By design. Total control of what is posted means total control of narrative.

Q is waiting for people to wake up and fight.

Q can't tell us.

We must choose to reject the fakeness.

Our free will must be totally free.

Wake up people.

>>6527542

If the internet is flooded by ai "anons", then how is it "an extension of our free will"?

Can you answer that anon?

We know there is a massive ai capability AT OUR ENEMIES finger tips.

What are they doing with it anon?

Can internet voices be emulated?

Yes or no anon?

So should we entertain the possibiliity?

You claim "you know the anons"– but can they interact like humans?

I've tested them, over and over– they can't interact like humans.

Do you deny this anon?

Do you think the "chans" would be left alone to go on their merry way anon?

"Anons" don't know now to interact like humans.

The bakers CAN'T

The board owner CAN'T.

They literally CAN'T INTERACT LIKE HUMANS.

Can you explain that anon?

Can you even try?

Go ahead, try.

>>6527542

And why ON EARTH would "SHITPOSTERS" come here?

There is ZERO PLAUSIBLE REASON FOR AN ARMY OF "SHITPOSTERS" to come here and stalk Q with a frenzy of pointless activity.

Do you have any idea what STUPID idea you are pushing?

This isn't /pol/ anon!

It's not /pol/.

How did it "acquire" /pol/'s culture, already whipped into a frenzy of activity, having no reason to cling to Q, having little interest in Q (since "shitposting" is infinitely irrelevant to our purpose here)?

You can't explain it fake anon.

So stop posting lies.

We are sick of lies.

We are tired of having OUR NARRATIVE CONTROLLED BY FAKE "SHITPOSTERS".

Stop forcing this lie.

Just shut up and get out.

Get the fake "shitposters" out.

Get your fake self out.

Get all the idiotic fake activity out.

Get it out now.

Stop posting.

>>6527581

All this cutesy "baker!" shit is FAKE

If this board is controlled by FAKENESS then Q is posting here SO PEOPLE WILL WAKE UP AND STOP BEING CONTROLLED BY FAKENESS.

That is the lesson.

Wake up and stop being sheep-herded by fake "anons" and their preposterous emulated board.

WAKE UP PEOPLE.

Stop bowing to "anons".

They are FAKE.

FIGHT