Possible proof that ABC news and the NYTimes received a copy of the unredacted FISA in April of 2017 (and confirmation of the theory that Wolfe texted the entire unredacted FISA):

https://www.patreon.com/posts/interview-with-26147174 (1:21:00 mark for relevant section)

In this interview with George Papadapoulos he tells Michael Tracey that he was approached by ABC and the New York Times on April 11th or 12th 2017 telling him that he was mentioned in a FISA. This was referencing his lobbying work in Israel. Now Papadapoulos is convinced there is another FISA warrant specifically targeting him but I think he is wrong. Here’s why:

1. The Nunes memo states that Papadapoulos is in all 4 Carter Page FISA warrants and renewals.

1. The Papadapoulos information is fully redacted in the FISA release.

1. The Papadapoulos/Israel connection was included in the Mueller report.

1. What are the chances that there exists an entirely separate FISA on Papadapoulos that reporters have had access to for which there is nothing that has been made public? The date is the key here. April 12th 2017 is the day WaPo went to print with the Carter Page FISA confirmation article.

Putting this together either ABC and the NYTimes have access to an entire separate FISA warrant for which they have never revealed exists or they had access to the unredacted Carter Page FISA. Either one is incredibly damning but the second option is much more likely. I really don’t understand how it’s not a bigger deal that Pap was approached by reporters who knew information included in a FISA warrant that has so far remained unreported publicly.

Do you remember when Comey was on TV laying out the evidence upon which a criminal case against Hillary Clinton was extremely clear? Do you remember after all of that, he stated “no reasonable prosecutor would…?”

The people of the US and the world have been delivered information needed and are still being delivered new information in all of this. Only the most corrupt people would do all of this and then deliver nothing.

It doesn’t sound like Trump and it doesn’t sound like Barr.

McCabe is in trouble. Comey is in big trouble. There has been a LOT of action, but I agree it’s not enough to call it even close to “done.” But consider the scale and scope of everything we know so far. I still hold it’s pretty much the entirety of the Obama administration as the M.O. of the administration indicates a pattern of using government power to go after opposing political entities. And I hold in some ways, it is the deep state responsible for much worse for far longer but it has really never been quite so overt and noticeable as this Obama administration.

There’s a LOT there. Consider the size of the hammer required to hit all of this in one fell swoop? This is a BIG hammer and they are building the friggen death star right above their heads and they (the criminals) are now realizing it. It has definitely felt nothing has been happening before, but it doesn’t feel like that now.

The “investigation” is ongoing, but I’m pretty sure they have EVERYTHING they need in all of this. But to make the case requires the assembly of a lot of things to prove everything we know in courts. This is not a “made for TV” event. It’s not for our entertainment. It’s about justice. All of this public stuff is more about preparing the public for what is going to happen because acceptance is necessary at the end of all this. It will be VERY traumatic and will very likely deepen the rift between the left and right in this country and in the world. And the left doesn’t handle failure well at all.

The crimes are huge. The reaction of the left will be huge.

You need to shift the investigation from US law to UK surveylance law. The UK laws are not symetirical to US laws. All the rules that the US operators need to follow don’t apply to the UK. The responsibility is much more centralised with the Home Secretary and she has a responsibility to the PM. The laws are shifted upwards. A judge still needs to give the OK. Because the law is more focused at the top level it means you can follow the paper trail at the top level – and that paper trail will mirror the antics in the US Whitehouse.

Under UK law the Home Sec (Theresa May) at the time would have been responsible for signing off surveylance in anybody who was not a threat to the UK – and – she would need to present evidence (dodgy dossier) to a UK judge. Things get interesting here because the UK HomeSec was even closer to the fraudulent dossier than Clinton, so has even less excuse about knowing it was fake.

In the UK prosecution of politicans, judges, policemen etc is handled by a special group of the Crown Prosecution Service who operate out of Crown Court House, on the south side of Southwark bridge, and they must

decide if a prosecution is in the “public interest” or not which gives them scope to squash any embarrassing charges.

The civil servant (perm gov) with the Hone Sec during Spygate is a guy called Olly Robbins who now runs (or rather blocks) the Brexit negotiations. So if May broke the law by soyug in Trump then he knows where the bodies are buried.

It doesn’t take a genius to see that May could come under pressure from Robbins to deliver brexit in name only (brino). Also that the same globalist actors in the UK who spied on Trump also thwarted Brexit. Same agenda. Same group of people. It might also explain why May dragged out Brexit even though her brino treaty it is now getting voted down for the fourth time and the Conservatives are down below 10% in the polls. She simply stayed in power long enough to see Trump be charged with Russia collusion. She now knows the gig is up and she will 100% come under scrutiny for being central to the biggest political scandle in US history. A scandle the US will follow to the UK.

What about oversight. Well the head of the UK intelligence oversight committee is an EU remainer who has also tried to thwart Brexit. So you will get no oversight. The Labour Party and MSM hate Trump for having the wrong kind of virtue so they will not question spying on him.

So look across the pond my friends for a rich trail of evidence and corruption by the anti democratic globalists.

.@AOC asked this pharma exec why a life-saving HIV drug costs nearly $2,000 in the U.S. and $8 in Australia

https://twitter.com/nowthisnews/status/1129132665423183872

The point of surveillance state is to uncover potential future dissidents and then eliminate them, defusing any revolution attempt that may take place

Don't believe the media lies, they will not use these technologies to benefit society by identifying criminals that target normal people.

They want normal people to be in fear of wild criminal gangs or just crazy people. The system we live in is designed so that most of the criminals are out on the streets in the shorter time available while keeping prisons full of fragile people, homeless or drug addicts.

All these big data collecting, surveillance cameras everywhere, tracking devices, everything is used to profile the population and track anyone that may end up having enough and potentially fight back.

We are at a point when mental, financial, political and environment pressure is very high on our heads. Instead improving the lives of everyone a surveillance machine is constructed to cut anyone who may try to resist or fight back.

There is a war against all of us and the majority don't even suspect it is happening.

BOOM WEEK AHEAD

explainded

"TREASON" coming to the MAINSTREAM