Anonymous ID: 142a8f May 18, 2019, 8:01 a.m. No.6528275   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8550 >>8813

Reposting cuz Elspeth Reeve is a fake news feckless cunt

 

>>6527414 (pb)

>>6527429 (pb)

 

Cache of twatter page still up. Check out her Wedding photo.

 

https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:TsH2h5WzLeEJ:https://twitter.com/elspethreeve+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

 

Elle Reeve

Verified account @elspethreeve

Jan 6

Got married on New Year's Eve. Pic by @mrglu lights, sound, music, flowers, planning by all (((our friends)))

 

So far friends look like mrglu, jk_haque, and metalmeteor

 

Adding the other cunt twatter cache for the keks

https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:CCTFQvA6lGIJ:https://twitter.com/lani_levine+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Anonymous ID: 142a8f May 18, 2019, 8:48 a.m. No.6528550   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8583 >>8585 >>8685

>>6528275

Elle Reeve fakin the news for over a decade

These fucking idiots sent the liar's wife to (((fact check))) her husband's stories and then had to retract the lies

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20080216043531/http://www.observer.com/2007/foer-s-foggy-new-republic-retraction-doesn-t-please-everyone

 

“Yeah, it’s a bummer, but it’s hard to shed any tears over Frank,” Elspeth Reeve was telling The Observer in a phone interview Friday, the day before her husband, U.S. Army Pvt. Scott Thomas Beauchamp, joined her at her mother’s house in Missouri for his 30-day leave.

 

Earlier that week, Ms. Reeve’s former boss, The New Republic’s editor, Franklin Foer, had published a 7000-word piece that concluded by formally retracting three first-person columns that the 24-year-old Mr. Beauchamp had written for the magazine over the summer. Soon after their publication, a chorus of conservative bloggers had raised questions about the veracity of the columns, in which Mr. Beauchamp offered first-person accounts of American troops in Iraq engaging in shocking behavior, such as running over dogs with their Bradleys, and mocking a woman whose face had been disfigured in an explosion. After carrying out a nearly five-month investigation, which involved attempts to corroborate Mr. Beauchamp’s claims with other members of his unit, Mr. Foer had concluded that the stories could not be verified.

 

It was (((Ms. Reeve))), 25, who, while working at TNR as a reporter-researcher, had recommended Mr. Beauchamp—not yet her husband at the time—to the magazine’s editors. Nevertheless, Ms. Reeve said, she wasn’t going to let the fact that Mr. Foer had publicly denounced Mr. Beauchamp’s work spoil her mood on the eve of her reunion with her husband.

 

Indeed, Mr. Foer’s piece was a classic Alford plea, which declared that even though the re-reporting effort had failed to turn up any discrepancies in Mr. Beauchamp’s stories—other than his placing a key scene in Iraq when in fact it took place in Kuwait, which Mr. Beauchamp has said was an honest mistake—the investigation had hit a dead end. TNR could no longer stand by the stories because too many of the facts were impossible to check, Mr. Foer wrote, and because Mr. Beauchamp, who continues to maintain that he did not fabricate anything, had consistently failed to help TNR in their attempts to vindicate him.

 

According to Jonathan Chait, a senior editor at TNR, the magazine received little cooperation from Mr. Beauchamp throughout the investigation process. “The basis [for the retraction] was just that Scott is maddening,” he said. “He’s just flaky, he’s irresponsible, he doesn’t do things that are in his own obvious interest to do. … Scott was the guy who lives in the group house and is supposed to pay the electric bill and just doesn’t, and the lights get shut off. Frank was the guy who had the lights shut out on him.” Mr. Beauchamp declined to comment for this story.

Anonymous ID: 142a8f May 18, 2019, 8:55 a.m. No.6528585   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6528550

The retraction is long and they try to pretend they weren't full of shit. Wouldn't you fact check something before you publish it?

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20071213024747/http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=51f6dc92-7f1d-4d5b-aebe-94668b7bfb32&p=3

 

The New Republic

Fog of War by Franklin Foer

The story of our Baghdad Diarist.

Post Date Monday, December 10, 2007

 

Fact-checking is a process used by most magazines (but not most newspapers) to independently verify what's in their articles. Beauchamp's anonymity complicated this process. Because we promised to protect his identity, we were reluctant to call Army public affairs to review his claims. What's more, the fact-checking of first-person articles about personal experiences necessarily relies heavily on the author's word and description of events.

 

But there was one avoidable problem with our Beauchamp fact-check.

=His wife, Reeve, was assigned a large role in checking his third piece.

While we believe she acted with good faith and integrity–not just in this instance, but throughout this whole ordeal–there was a clear conflict of interest. At the time, our logic–in hindsight, obviously flawed–was that corresponding with a soldier in Iraq is logistically difficult and Reeve was already routinely speaking with him. It was a mistake–and we've imposed new rules to prevent future fact-checking conflicts of interest.

Anonymous ID: 142a8f May 18, 2019, 9:10 a.m. No.6528691   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6528608

>>6528583

>that ‘list’ that was floating around of antifa members that were at Charlottesville

Thanks anon.

 

So considering we know Elle staged a fake news story with her "husband" in 2007, what does that say about her Charlottesville reporting? That shit was staged AF too.