What are "anons"?

Why is there a mechanical, repetitive, unnatural staleness to their lingo?

WHY IS "CHAN CULTURE" STUCK IN PLACE?

Why is chan culture spinning its wheels, and not growing?

Does that look organic?

BETTER YET, why is chan culture EXACTLY THE SAME AS IT WAS THREE YEARS AGO?

Culture changes MOST when politics and events change most– yet "chan culture" has STOPPED CHANGING precisely when events HAVE CHANGED MOST.

It looks very unnatural.

The advent of Q should have initiated a whole new era of "chan culture"

Instead, "chan culture" became ABSOLUTELY FROZEN IN PLACE, and now gets recycled and spewed out in a non-stop frenzy of activity, AT Q.

THINK, PEOPLE: IS THIS NATURAL?

Q is waiting for PEOPLE to wake up and figure out that "anons" ARE NOT PEOPLE.

We are being duped.

Q can't tell us, because we must choose freely to reject it.

So wake up people.

Wake up please.

>>6537663

>>6537681

>>6537722

ASK YOURSELF A QUESTION

Where do all the "anons" come from?

4chan /pol/ SWARMS with "anons" vigorously outputting miserable "chan" noises all day long…

BUT, there are SO MANY of these"anons" that not only the 4chan /pol/ ones churn furiously along nonstop, but ALSO 8chan /pol/ is so vibrant and virulent with its own “anons” THAT IT IS IMPLICATED IN SHOOTINGS we are hearing about in the news…

So while 4chan, already– which used to be about 'anonymous' hacktivism (which disappeared)– gets "taken over by neo-nazi anons", there are still then enough “anons” left over TO FILL A WHOLE NOTHER SPAZZY /POL/ ON 8CHAN…

So many!

And yet…

Now we come to /QRESEARCH…

And lo and behold!

There are SO MANY busy, repetitive, relentlessly productive “anons” THAT THEY FILL THIS BOARD UP TOO!

The “anons” here post a slightly modified version of what they post on /pol/– but clearly the same basic template is followed…

Wow, that's a lot “anons” staying very busy all day and all night!

So many that they not only fill up two /pols/ with a frenzy of tedious, toxic crap, but they FEEL COMPELLED TO REPRODUCE THE EXACT SAME THING HERE.

With vague occasional reference to Q– but often COMPLETELY CONTRADICTING Q…

So ask yourself one simple question:

WHERE ARE ALL THESE "ANONS" COMING FROM?

USE LOGIC

Was the internet allowed to be/stay organic?

Or was control sought?

If control were sought, did it succeed?

If control were sought and the effort failed, then we would have noticed the consequences of that failure…

No such thing happened.

Therefore, either the internet is controlled, or NO ONE EVER TRIED TO CONTROL IT.

Hmmm, what do you think is most likely?

Think

Why is /Qresearch JUST ANOTHER /POL/ FACSIMILE?

Does that smell organic?

Will humans EVER wake up and fight?

And to be clear: it is not just the 'toxic' stuff that is emulated: ALMOST ALL POSTS ARE EMULATED. By design. Total control of what is posted means total control of narrative.

Q is waiting for people to wake up and fight.

Q can't tell us.

We must choose to reject the fakeness.

Our free will must be totally free.

Wake up people.