Anonymous ID: 33c615 May 19, 2019, 4:30 p.m. No.6538829   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8937

>>6538768

>…Biden…inaudible…"speak louder"….

 

Maybe they were messing with the sound system because they didn't want the crowd to hear his verbal fumbles. Isn't he just going through the motions, anyway?

Anonymous ID: 33c615 May 19, 2019, 4:51 p.m. No.6538991   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8998 >>9096

>>6538834

>disregard, I took monarch as "Queen, King, etc…" not as a MK/butterfly reference.

 

This is something I keep forgetting to mention. Could Monarch really be code for the actual monarchy? Where did MK-Ultra originate? I read it was imported with Operation Paperclip. I also read that Tavistock did experiments on soldiers during WW1 concerning the amount of extreme war-related stress they could take. Then there's all the other associated mind manipulation. The latest "royal" family is German.

Anonymous ID: 33c615 May 19, 2019, 5:24 p.m. No.6539212   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6539096

>I believe that people of certain genetics are more prone to certain MK capabilities.

>If those genes belong to a certain genetic line it could account for the inbreeding in past nobility….

 

I see your point and have considered the possibility myself, although I think their line has become seriously diluted. But what I meant was that maybe the Monarch Program and similar have been formulated and run by organizations like Tavistock on the general population on behalf of the Monarchy / Commitee of 300 / etc. With that butterfly being misdirection.