>>6539126 (pb)

REPOST LATE LAST BREAD

Soooo..if I'm reading all this right and put 2 and 2 together correctly re: Anon's MIRROR theory + what Q told us to get organized and so on..

few quick thoughts.

1) Q doesn't show up that often and we're being sort of weaned and now able to stand on our own feet in this phase. Flynn referred to Anons as 'digital soldiers' while Q told us, this op, besides waking people the fuck up, is about BUILDING AN ARMY. So, strategically we'd be able to be far ahead of FakeNewsMedia, if we'd consistently push back their claims with proofs about all the Spygate stuff we have gained over the last 1,5 years. It wasn't proof back then. It is NOW. Due to timecodes and all the infrastrcture built during that time with qmap etc. and certain twitter timelines we could nail them to the wall if we only would know how to strike in an organized fashion. Now it's still pretty chaotic and selfish from some to simply grow their own accounts without really impacting debate as much as they possibly could. TEAM SPIRIT.

2)We're on offense now. Offense means NOT PASSIVE. So..if we're an Army, it's on us to fuckin organize and strike underneath their phony posts and engage people not only with memes but with undeniable proofs, own tweets from a year ago. "How could we know back then?" "Why didn't you write about it when we engaged you a year ago?" ..that sort of stuff.

Getting them [BOXED IN] to a certain extent.

While chaos always has the moment of surprise in it, the whole "expect us" aspect floats with it too. If we're able to combine these things, we could rip their fake shit to shreds in no time. We collected all the data exactly for this phase. Offense means using what we got to get them where we want them. WE ARE THE NEWS NOW. They only pretend to be.

3) We could use a tool like trumptwitterarchive.com but for every twitter account, so that whenever Anon sees fit he could go search his own account quickly for certain topics or dates to counter phony claims with Anon's own tweets. Also a dump of as many infographics collected over time sorted by topic, qlocks etc. accessible by normies and Anons alike.

Again. WE ARE THE NEWS NOW.

(i wrote so much text.)

>>6540186

an example how to proceed you mean?

simply sorting out posts of FakeNews reporters, pick out the facts we got(they report falsely or not to the extent necessary to discern as normie) and nail them to the wall. FACTS NOT FICTION would be a phrase i'd use here..all these big accounts are cool but their own emotional spin is sometimes really annoying and to be honest quite embarrassing in their wording..we have had soo many great infographics over time that it would be just two quick logical questions that would(if well worded) hammer them for certain.

and that's just with twitter. algorithm oftentimes push up the garbage no one desires, outright malnutrition if you ask me..and they push down or even hide the good stuff. this would be the moment anon could post a reply to a fake news tweet and other anons, twatfags simply push the reply upwards and drown the shit.

>>6540291

You're a journo who will try to spin it? amirite?

you see..Krassensteins use exactly this mode to fuck up POTUS feed. You won't get too far with this..

>>6540318

and their friends and the connected(assumed) botnet pushes shitposts with what they call memes(we know it's garbage)..soo..factual representation of facts with enough support would do the job..

>>6540306

get fucked, ponytail.