entertaining to be sure..
>inforomation warfare thread
>Q proofs
>moar angles
>etc
The way I look at any website anons choose to do is this:
They must relay factual sauce-based proofs. No matter what the topic is.
Not pie-in-the sky bullshit. Which is fine, anons know this very well.
The problem is that the sites that are around now are not this.
Most of them are raw intel display sites. I am not shitting on them at all, just calling it as I see it. The other issue is the conflating of describing this raw intel in retrospect, with getting citizen journalism properly entrenched as it should have been in the first place
This is the goal for the shills, imo.
I think that's why some anons have been singing like coal mine canaries.
Any type of citizen journolism going forward will need to be supported by a distributed platform so it can't ever be censored ever again.
The protocals and programming were there to do this ten years ago. Literally the only thing that needs to happen is for the public utility option to be played.
Then someone will create the first blockhain messaging system that uses the xmpp protocol.
> Maybe the audience was all in on it
It is very common in the entertainment industry to fill sound stages with paid audiences.
This is why it is so damn dangerous to classify news presentation as "entertainment" and to allow propaganda on one's own people.
>Agree that anything productive is sauced based proofs, my background is scientific.
>QResearch is primarily a raw intel site, so far as diggs go, I think. It is difficult to, for example, to function as an investigative journalist here as a result. For one cannot develop a reputation for being a trustworthy source, because of anonymity.
That is by design here. Your identity means nothing, and it should mean nothing
>Also hard to work in teams on a sustained basis because there is no way to communicate on a ongoing basis.
That is why this board is the inaugural vessel. This is also why the conversation about what happens next is going on.
>So: can we really "be the news" given these limitations?
Yes. And I quote:
Through tempest, storm
And darkest night,
Anons don't rest
'Til things are right.
-anon
sauce: https://pastebin.com/V31YRagx
''WE (anons) came here to get away from the programmatic censorship on the csocial media platforms.''
Until that goes away, here will remain the best place for anons to be the news..
> IDK. What does Q really mean when he makes this statement?
Read the bread. It's all there.
>Do you know the answer about the locking of the info warfare thread?
Ask the mods in meta, that what meta is for.
fair enough, it's a very complex subject that is up for a power-grab, and we all know especially that :)
so the conversation will be interesting and impassioned, to say the least.
I'm reading this as the Chinese telling Google that theyare pissed at Huawei.
ABC/Google is working directly with the Chinese government on a Choogle search , isn't it?