If (HUGE "if") HRC died on 9.11.16, how does a stand-in/doppelgänger/clone finish up the campaign, do the debates, etc? Are they THAT good? Between things I've observed here over the last year, comments about her "hydration" that day, the NYC TV station that broadcast her ''DEATH announcement that night (no joke–just YouTube search it), etc…I'm just wondering how capable these hypothetical duplicate(s) must/can be. Election night is of course another possible/probable date–POTUS used "supposed to be a party…turned into a funeral" again tonight in describing her that night'' (Steve Hilton's Next Revolution show 5/19/19). Just all very curious. World of reality/make-believe quite impressively intertwined.

gif just for fun. Don't know what to think about that.

>>6541454

Describes everyone still clinging to CNN and MSNBC.

>>6541487

Yeah…fully understood. Many of us accept this notion without any problem, but fail to take it far enough. We tend to mentally limit it…like, "well they couldn't have CGI stand up on the debate stage in front of all those people" but maybe the debate wasn't real. Maybe the audience was all in on it. Maybe the audience was CGI." I know this much–Obama was allegedly in Cols OH, not far from me, before the midterms doing rallies (might recall videos surfacing that made him seem "coked-up"). I asked my friend, a strong Obama supporter, and he knew nothing about it…saw no evidence the rallies actually took place. The show/stage may be much larger and broader in scope than I typically think…and I consider my mind to be VERY open to "crazy." A good chunk of me has seen stuff that says he's dead too, but the official narrative does take its toll on such things.