Deutsche Bank Flagged Trump, Kushner Accounts for Suspicious Activity - Reports

The fraud unit at Deutsche Bank flagged bank accounts belonging to Donald Trump and Jared Kushner for suspicious activity, recommending that the accounts be reported to federal financial crimes groups.

The activity on accounts belonging to both Trump and Kushner was flagged by Deutsche Bank software made to detect actions that appears to be potentially illegal. Five current and former employees of the bank have confirmed to the New York Times that the accounts were flagged.

Suspicious activity reports were prepared for filing with the US Treasury for investigation as possible federal financial crimes, yet, according to the report, bank executives overruled the employees and did not alert the government.

Tammy McFadden, a former DB anti-money laundering specialist, said she looked at the accounts in question herself and was fired after raising concerns about transactions.

Deutsche Bank told the Times “the suggestion that anyone was reassigned or fired in an effort to quash concerns relating to any client is categorically false.” The bank also told the Times it had increased its scrutiny of potential money laundering.

A Trump Organization spokeswoman said she has “no knowledge of any ‘flagged’ transactions with Deutsche Bank,” also adding that the organization currently has "no operating accounts with Deutsche Bank.”

Kushner Companies spokeswoman Karen Zabarsky told The Hill in a statement that "The New York Times tries to create scandalous stories which are totally false when they run out of things to write about."

Zabarsky added that "any allegations regarding Deutsche Bank’s relationship with Kushner Companies which involved money laundering is completely made up and totally false."

Deutsche Bank came up repeatedly during Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of alleged Trump-Russia collusion and Russia’s alleged interference in the 2016 US election. The US Justice Department released the redacted version of the report in mid-April summarizing the outcome of Mueller’s investigation. According to the document, the investigation did not find any evidence of collusion between Russia and Trump's campaign team.

Russia has repeatedly denied any claims of interference in the US political system, saying the allegations were made up to excuse the election loss of Trump's opponent and deflect public attention from actual instances of election fraud and corruption.

https://sputniknews.com/us/201905201075145689-deutsche-bank-flagged-trump-kushner-accounts/

>>6540935

All Zionist sauces…………

Wanna try again

The Origins of the Deep State in North America. PART III.

Our first two installments have dealt with the origins of the Deep State in North America by reviewing the creation of the Rhodes Scholarship/Chatham House network at the end of the 19th century and the infiltration of indoctrinated scholars into every governing branch of western society. We traced the key players in this Oxford-based network who were formed with the intent of fulfilling the will of Cecil Rhodes to “form a church of the British Empire” and undo the effects of the American Revolution as a global phenomenon. We also saw how these networks worked closely with another early “think tank” called the Fabian Society in order to advance an agenda that required the destruction of the sovereign nation state system which had been founded upon the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia. This was exemplified by the 1999 “Chicago speech” of Fabian asset Tony Blair when he stated that the world must now embark upon a “post-Westphalian order” setting the stage for 9/11 and the new era of regime change that was soon unleashed. In the following report, we will look at the origins of the Fabian Society, by examining some of its founding members and governing philosophy.

The Nature of the Beast

Polarization is the name of empire. If a society can be kept under the control of their belief in what their senses tell them, then the invisible structures governing their behaviour will remain mystical and unknowable. More importantly than that, those intentions shaping such structures towards a pre-determined goal will also remain unknowable. If unknowable, then beyond the reach of judgement, and if beyond the reach of judgement, then unchangeable. This has been the great secret of empire since the days of the Babylonian priesthood and Babylon`s whore Rome, since whose collapse, three more incarnations have manifested themselves in the forms of the Byzantine, Venice and Anglo-Dutch empires. This is the dynamic at the heart of what has today come to be known as “the Deep State”.

With the 15th century rediscovery of the efficient power of self-conscious reason as a knowable and self-developing potential in the soul of every human, the renaissance-humanist conception of mankind had blossomed. With that conception of imago viva dei (1) led in large measure by the unique discoveries and life`s devotion of Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1460), a revolution in science, art and statecraft occurred. Natural law both in the sciences, in the arts and especially as a standard when shaping physical economic policy became accessible to self-consciousness.

https://theduran.com/the-origins-of-the-deep-state-in-north-america-part-iii/

Part 1

https://theduran.com/the-origins-of-the-deep-state-in-north-america/

Part 2

https://theduran.com/the-origins-of-the-deep-state-in-north-america-part-ii/

1/2

>>6540959

-George Bernard Shaw, Prefaces (London: Constable and Co., 1934), p. 296

“I believe that now and always the conscious selection of the best for reproduction will be impossible; that to propose it is to display a fundamental misunderstanding of what individuality implies. The way of nature has always been to slay the hindmost, and there is still no other way, unless we can prevent those who would become the hindmost being born. It is in the sterilization of failure, and not in the selection of successes for breeding, that the possibility of an improvement of the human stock lies.”

-H.G. Wells in American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 10 (1904), p. 11

“We may perhaps assume that, if people grow less superstitious, government will acquire the right to sterilize those who are not considered desirable as parents. This power will be used, at first, to diminish imbecility, a most desirable object. But probably, in time, opposition to the government will be taken to prove imbecility, so that rebels of all kinds will be sterilized. Epileptics, consumptives, dipsomaniacs and so on will gradually be included; in the end, there will be a tendency to include all who fail to pass the usual school examinations. The result will be to increase the average intelligence; in the long run, it may be greatly increased. But probably the effect upon really exceptional intelligence will be bad.

Eugenics has, of course, more ambitious possibilities in a more distant future. It may aim not only at eliminating undesired types, but at increasing desired types. Moral standards may alter so as to make it possible for one man to be the sire of a vast progeny by many different mothers. … If eugenics reached the point where it could increase desired types, it would not be the types desired by present-day Eugenists that would be increased, but rather the type desired by the average official. Prime Ministers, Bishops, and others whom the State considers desirable might become the fathers of half the next generation…

If we knew enough about heredity to determine, within limits, what sort of population we would have, the matter would of course be in the hands of State officials, presumably elderly medical men. Whether they would really be preferable to Nature I do not feel sure. I suspect that they would breed a subservient population, convenient to rulers but incapable of initiative.”

2/2