>>6544160(lb)

>I understand your opinion of the crumb sites. I think those sites are extremely useful, and I think the site the anon is trying to make for notables would be also useful and from what I've seen so do other anons.

>Clearly not you, but your paranoid outrage is noted by anons and bakers.

>Learn to bake.

you realize bakers just copy and paste and that you could easily be replaced by ebot?

Anons also notice that when a bakers union is called out you try to convince them you aren't a member until it's pointed out that you are. Then it become "you're just paranoid anon".