>>654566

worthy work

some of those are quite reliant on context, though, could be good to have a reference of where they're used.

also some have doublemeanings options, should keep that in mind

>>654577

it's the early-bread Filter ID+ post

don't tell the newfags tho

>>654603

not saying i agree with the method, i very very very rarely filter too.

But it explains a lot of really dumb bait posts (like the persistence of fakeQ)

>>654609

>@snowden not responding to the q taunts.

watchu talkin bout

24hrs to respond.

He did, smartly.

Public view.

Q

haven't seen his twats/retwats compiled analyzed tho

that would actually be helpful

>>654666

holy fuck

>law

<reasons

the state we're in

>>654708

1. Cat-herders/hall monitors posting their demands to Q