Anonymous ID: e81cf8 March 13, 2018, 1:36 p.m. No.654800   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4839 >>5049

>>654558

Post from a European group on FB I got added to.

 

Noteworthy that this took place near a place fully capable of manufacturing chemical weapons. Answers the question of where the hell this stuff would have been mixed. Many of them have very short lifespans in storage and would complicate transportation.

Anonymous ID: e81cf8 March 13, 2018, 2:11 p.m. No.655079   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5151

>>655027

The point was that IBOR = Net Neutrality.

 

You can't just meme something people have already rejected and get them to accept it. "But the IBOR isn't net neutrality!" - your memes do not clarify this, or what it is the IBOR is. Thus, it will be rejected as Net Neutrality was.

 

You are not social engineers. Do not drink from the same poisoned cup the cabal dished out to scientists.

Anonymous ID: e81cf8 March 13, 2018, 2:24 p.m. No.655196   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>655151

I don't disagree with the necessity.

 

The thing is that if our job is to promote an idea, we must be able to distinguish it from what has been rejected. We are not pushing for what AT&T was proposing, which was Net Neutrality 3^4.

 

This is a much more complicated thing to meme than "release the memo.". Because of that, it takes a much more careful craft of memes.

 

Of course the chans are unlikely to become discussion centers of the bill of rights. But a consensus understanding of what the fuck this thing is and means is necessary as it must be a component of the memes.

Anonymous ID: e81cf8 March 13, 2018, 2:33 p.m. No.655278   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>655192

Well… I did release authority for Q team to hunt them at will.

 

Not sure if that has anything to do with it, and if it did, my ego does not need the food to further fuel it. In fact… It would be quite concerning if it did. Kind of like how Picard had to reconcile the anti-time field. I'm not sure I am ready to deal with that, just yet. Not sure if I have a CHOICE if it is, however.