Morans keep posting JPEGs

dipshit bakers keep using them

same shit

different day

>>6549765

>However, leaving out notables just bc of form would be worse.

how useful is this post?

>>6549553 if you didn't have the title you wouldn't know squat about it For UK anons: EE network has CRASHED: Users across the UK complain of a lack of phone and internet connection

>>6549736

>Don't see you baking

don't see you baking either, what's your point?

I see notables that were picked by the baker and not nominated by anons… that doesn't make them bad notables but it does mean the baker looked at it carefully and thought it would be useful to include in the list.

the baker knowingly adds JPEGs as notables, that says something about the baker doesn't it

>>6549553

>>6549822

if you do not strive for excellence what do you pursue?

>>6549863

see

>>6549553

>>6549977

it sux to use inferior equipment doesn't it