Anonymous ID: a43889 May 21, 2019, 7:33 p.m. No.6555007   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5046 >>5054

>>6554916

 

I know The President will sometimes remind us to "listen carefully" when he's interviewed on Hannity.

 

But I don't know what to make of Sean to be honest.

 

He's using the word TREASON enough. I like that. He repeats our mantra, Game Over.

 

I'm sure he's on a short leash at Fox though. Or worse.

 

What I don't like is how confusing they make the crime every night. Maybe a graphic or a chart would be nice? I'll make you one Sean.

 

Literally, he starts ranting and you get about 20 names in five minutes with details about FISA process and declassification. Sara Carter is just as bad. Put them together, and the two of them sound like they're decoding Fermat's Last Theorem. Sean says, "let me walk you through this," and I know everyone's lost within seconds. I can barely keep up and I've spent more time trying to keep up with the facts than 99.9% of Americans.

 

So does Sean REALLY want the people to understand this?

 

If they do, Sean and Sara need help. (We're here when you want to talk, Sean.)

 

Not to mention the fact that they seem to go over and over the same facts, in the same confusing manner, as though there's nothing really new.

 

Maybe Sean is part of The Plan. I'm just raising my suspicions.

Anonymous ID: a43889 May 21, 2019, 7:47 p.m. No.6555099   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6555046

 

Ya you're right. I'm sure there's nothing nefarious about Fox News, a subsidiary of 21st Century Fox, which broadcasts primarily from New York City to 86 countries and overseas territories worldwide.

 

Tucker is also "ineffective" in my view.

 

Honestly, one anon's meme delivers more powerful, digestible truth than an hour of back-to-back Hannity and Tucker.

 

I know that if I were going to front-run this, I'd have MY GUY who appear to be 100% patriotic on the side of Trump, and who seem to understand all of the complex details of this extensive treasonous plot, and I'd make sure that the people deferred to MY GUY to explain it all because I'll have convinced the people that only MY GUY can possibly understand it all. It's just too complicated, right?! So listen to MY GUY.

 

I'll tell you I don't like the way both Tucker and Hannity keep using the word "conspiracy" in a pejorative sense. Yes, they're referring to the Deep State antics when they use the word "conspiracy" but I know that if I was producing their show I'd never let them use that word in a negative light. Conspiracies are REAL. Conspiracies have been our downfall. Conspiracy theories should ALL be embraced and analyzed so we can decide which are true and which are false. Using the word conspiracy the way Hannity and Tucker do just feels like a way to smear the notion of "conspiracy" altogether. Just wait until the shoe is on the other foot, and the Cabal starts to call Q a conspiracy again. How has Sean Hannity helped us then?

Anonymous ID: a43889 May 21, 2019, 8:07 p.m. No.6555263   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6555046

 

Sorry, I meant to say "conspiracy THEORY."

 

Not "conspiracy."

 

Tucker and Hannity keep referring to the horrible "conpiracy theories" of Brennan, Comey etc. As though a "conspiracy theory" is a horrible thing.

 

A CONSPIRACY (to commit treason) is horrible. That's the truth.

 

But a conspiracy THEORY is not in and of itself horrible. Remember, WE ARE A CONSPIRACY THEORY.

 

So why is Hannity constantly using the term "conspiracy theory" in a pejorative sense? It will only backfire on us. We want the American People to EMBRACE conspiracy theories. Not reject them the way the CIA trained us to do. Hannity is just perpetuating in a very sly way the CIA's brainwashing about why all "conspiracy theories" should be rejected.

 

We need to embrace CONSPIRACY THEORIES in order to understand what the CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT TREASON (and enslave the world) really is. Every conspiracy theory should be analyzed for truth before rejecting it out of hand just because someone calls it a "conspiracy theory."