Anonymous ID: 57d4f1 May 22, 2019, 12:05 p.m. No.6560030   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6560016

Worth pondering.

 

When you can't attack the information directly, you attack the source, if that fails, you 'create false misleading information' to discredit knowing 'select' 'unaware' followers would not take the time to self-corroborate the claims (same vehicle/tactics used by FAKE NEWS media).

Logical thinking always wins.

Nothing can stop what is coming.

As the target(s) turn to the other side, the attacks will intensify.

We have the source.

Q

Anonymous ID: 57d4f1 May 22, 2019, 12:31 p.m. No.6560253   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0327

>>6560244

>why would the UK govt have to give approval to interview Steele unless he was currently still working for the UK govt or worked with the UK govt to create dossier and keep Trump from getting elected???

 

That was Mark Steyn today on Rush, right? When he said it, I smacked my forehead. Evidence right there that Steele is not a "former" spook at all, but still under authority of the Crown.

Anonymous ID: 57d4f1 May 22, 2019, 1:27 p.m. No.6560669   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6560579

Alfa Bank said that its scans ran for two days after each update. But Maxโ€™s data donโ€™t show a consistent pattern of two-day spikes. Another concern lay in the chronology. The bank had received e-mails from the Trump domain in late 2015 and early 2016, which should have triggered lookups. But, according to the data, the lookups didnโ€™t begin until May, 2016. In response to a question about this discrepancy, Birnbaum said that the Trend Micro software had not been โ€œfully integratedโ€ until Marchโ€”but that wouldnโ€™t account for the time between March and May.

 

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/10/15/was-there-a-connection-between-a-russian-bank-and-the-trump-campaign