>>656104

Let's check again:

Roths control cults/ church/ P= Palestine

You say that P cannot stand for Palestine, because no one takes orders from a "place".

That's correct.

But where does this Q post say that Soros takes orders from P?

It says:

Roths:

are the contollers of cult leader, church and P.

Of Banks and financial institutions.

Roths control also worldwide the governments that control the people.

SaudiArabia:

controls oil tech, sex (even sexual exploitation of children),

they further control the US and UK politicians and the tech companies of US and UK

Soros:

controls organisations of people, needed to create division and to brainwash the people.

He also is the manager/ operator of slush funds.

This post from Q doesn't say that P controls Soros.

Therefore P could be "Palestine".

Roths control Palestine.

(And blackmail Israel with it…)

51984

Rothschilds (cult leaders)(church)(P)

Banks / Financial Institutions

WW Gov Control

Gov Controls People

SA

Oil Tech Sex/Children

SA Controls (assigned) US / UK Politicians / Tech Co's (primary)

Soros

Controls organizations of people (create division / brainwash) + management / operator of slush funds (personal net worth never reduces think DOJ settlements Consumer Iran Enviro pacts etc etc)

/_\ - Rock (past)(auth over followers)

_\ (present)

(Future)

Order is critical.

Strings cut to US/UK.

Expand your thinking.

Swamp drain.

1 - sexual harassment exit + future

….

[R] - No.

Bomb away.

Q

>>656396

Ty, for reading and being open minded.

It's not about who is right, but about what is the right answer.

We cannot find it out, without discussing it.

>>656443

Okay.

Yes, Roths control cult leaders, church and P.

Either you say that the pope is a part of the church, then P needs to be someone else.

Or you think like this: cult leaders are sort of religious leaders, then Q mentioned "chuch", which is again about religion, followed by P=Pope who too is part of religious theme here.

Church is more then catholic church (think protestants and others).

If you think in terms of religion, cults, beliefs, P=Pope would make sense.

Would it make sense, if Soros would take orders from the Pope of the catholic church?

What would the catholic church want to achieve, by using Soros as a tool?

Roths control P.

P gives orders to Soros.

P could be Pope.

Or: Q's posts don't eliminate the possibility that P might stand for Pope.

"Google is destroying the most glorious gift humanity was granted in the last 300 years [the internet]. Google is illuminati. The future under Google is a fascist dystopia, their way or the highway, no room for dissidents, no room for free speech. Google is a boot stomping on your face for eternity.

Google is the deep state. Forget about conventional wars, forget about spies, forget about intelligence agencies, forget about all of that. It's all about the internet and Google running the internet. They decide how you feel, what you think, what information you can and can't look at, and ultimately who does and doesn't have a voice."

David Bowie's final message written weeks before he died, 2015

http:// howtheworldreallyworks.info

>>656715

I remember a spy sent from the US last year to find out something about the Vatican.

He was exposed and iirc, returned back to the US..

Save the best thing for last: Exposing the Pope?

We are all still speculating, it seems.

>>656805

Q mentioned in the "P" post the governments (controlling the people),

therefore P cannot stand for people.

>>656824

The pope as head of the catholic church doesn't acknowledge Israel.

Safe the best for last could mean to force the P=Pope to acknowledge Israel.

Maybe Trump has foreshadowed this by saying that he is willing to move the US-embassy to Jerusalem…