Anonymous ID: f82c92 May 22, 2019, 7:43 p.m. No.6563547   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6563175

The reason they use "cover-up" is because that was how Nixon was allegedly brought down.

Of course he was forced out of office by constant drumming by the Media, but the evidence was what? Sparse.

With Trump there is nothing. But basically the same with Nixon. They claimed they had tapes which showed he lied about the breakin at the Dem headquarters [done by the same dudes involved with plot against Castro, "Bay of Pigs" who were then turned to kill Kennedy. At least they were part of that plot.

It looks like Nixon was set-up. Maybe Ford, his successor was seen to be more pliant to the will of H. W. Bush, since Ford was a major player in the cover-up of the killing of JFK

Anyway, that's why Pelosi in her stoned-out state thinks it's so cute to call out "cover - up"

The by-line of the Nixon scandal "Watergate" was "It's not the crime, it's the cover-up that's gets them"

In POTUS case they are trying to allege "cover-up" when it was actually self-defense for being wrongly accused.

Lindsey Graham looked tonight as though irritate with Hannity for dwelling on the lapses of Mueller. I wonder why?

I can't help but think the Nixon "Victory sign" was a double - YOD . a "Y"

coincidence?

Anonymous ID: f82c92 May 22, 2019, 7:59 p.m. No.6563674   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6563615

>Put simply, Obama ultimately OK’d by using the non govt email addy to communicate w/ Clinton.

 

Unsure about that ^^ I think it was an excuse they planned to use. For it to be approved by Hussain, wouldn't it have to be explicit, in writing?

For him to do it, if it was connected to selling info abroad, to enemies, it would be a case of "High Crime" not a case of 'giving appropriate permissions"?