RE: Recent Notable on DJT twats on Benghazi.
Italy. US Mil help – specific forces for defending US embassies in the region in which AMB Stevens was active - Lybia – help was available, ready, capable, but order to stand down.
Growler is prime example.
Italy. Go to Rome. Italy-Lybia connexions?
Hussein Admin's purge of US Mil.
Related to what was really being covered up in the events that are now known by the name, Benghazi?
Why are we here?
We were her hay [fodder].
Hussein Admin [Sec HRC] compromised by knowledge that OBL and alQaeda top leaders were protected in Iran – with Hussein/GWB complicity. Meanwhile the "good war" was in Afghanistan in search of … OBL and alQaeda leadership.
Moar flows from such. See Iran billion dollar giveaway. See concessions to the growth of the Calliphate. Moar and moar. That is the outgrowth which is covered up by the tragic distraction of "Benghazi" scandal. Deeply distrubing. Look here not there. F'ng treasonous.
Benghazi and "Why are we here?"
How deep does the DS interests go beneath the surface of the Benghazi events?
Was there moar in that compound that was at stake than the lives of Americans abandoned by the Hussein Admin?
What did Obama know and when did he know it? Where was he during the attack – an event that last longer than the rocket attack, of course – as the Commander in Chief? Did he turn a blind eye or was he mindful of what would transpire?
Treason is not a word used lightly.
The payback is coming. That's important. Correction of the deeply compromised infrastructure – yes the intel infrastructure and its tentacles throughout the economy and its impingements on civil society – are at stake.
With that in mind, re-review the recent political habeenings re Infrastructure Deal-making.
Godspeed Anons.
"Why is MS13 a priority _ nobody got this."
Not necessary that this line is there to be taken in the context of the entirety of the content of the rest of the Q Post 5.
However, "Follow the money, it's the key", seems instructive for all that follows in that post.
The line immediately after the nobody line is: "Could people pay such gangs to kill opponents and why / how to insulate against exposure?"
Follow the money to / through the gangs. Such gangs. MS13 "by way of one example". This may be an instruction to broaden out thinking beyond the specific gang, MS13 being one example not THE key but a lead that guides us to the key via the money.
Whose priority? MS13 is whose priority? Yes, POTUS supports what ICE is doing against MS13. He often uses that example, a yuge example, to justify the resources needed to build the wall. And what is "the wall" - the beautiful wall? It is many things all of which demarcate the border – the bounds of sovereignty itself. Whose sovereignty – not merely the nation's, but that of The People.
Now, if this is what is at stake, as we follow the money, then, we must ask how it is that this truth "cannot fully be exposed"?
The mechanics are at issue, yes. So perhaps from the broadest thinking back to the moar narrow thinking is practical.
The answer is yes to the question "Could people pay such gangs to kill opponents"? But it would be mind blowing to learn this has happened in the USA, yes?
But Q has invited Anons to learn "why / how to insulate against exposure?" The first level would be the why and how for the protagonists – those who'd hire the killers. The next level would be the why and how for those taking on these criminal bosses.
TY Anon for revisiting what is a very early Q Post but which has always, through-out the years of this movement, has been an essential lens through which to view the moves and counter-moves. Why and how to insulate against exposure?
>Who is "no one?"
>Q's statement while asking questions could very well be taken as a reveal that others were subject to the same questions.
Q: Why is MS13 a priority _ nobody got this.
There is no question mark even if the line began with "Why". It is a convoluted statement of fact rather than a question. Could be read as a question, yes.
Note the grammar in nearby line: "The truth is mind blowing and cannot fully be exposed."
Mind-blowing, noun.
Cannot vs. can not vs can't.
Injection of "fully" to split "cannot" from "be exposed".
With that example in mind, re-read the statement that can be read as a question.
Q: Why is MS13 a priority _ nobody got this.
Nobody got this – why [the reasons] MS13 is a priority.
Ask yourself, is "got this" about receiving or keeping or fetching? If it was not fetched, then, it could not be kept nor sent (for reception). If kept then why was it used as a guide in the Q Post 5? If fetched and sent, why was it not received?
The truth has not been fetched, yet, by Anons, but we have been guided to follow the money re gangs such as.
TY Anon.
The truth can not be exposed in full.
It can be partially exposed.
Which is moar than completely hidden but also fits with the notion of insulation which neither fully exposed nor fully hidden.
Making MS13 an example, target for real criminal reasons, gets at the truth but still provides insulation of different sorts. Political, legal, social, cultural, and moar. Insulation is the means by which to control the exposure of the truth and restrain the protagonists while, at the same time, firing the shot across the bow.
And as such it serves as a statement and as a question. Not just to Anons.
Nobody.
Nobodies.
Who are nobodies?
From that universal of suspects, who is the nobody, you might ask, Anon.
Has that nobody gotten the message?
I think you are right to see the question in Q's statement. Expand that, it was I think Q is instructing.