Anonymous ID: 13fc12 May 23, 2019, 10:32 a.m. No.6567619   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7643

pb

>>6567012

From 1996

Small bit: However, controversy since 1947 concerning the possible legal consequences arising from the deliberate alteration of large storm systems meant that little future experimentation could be conducted on storms which had the potential to reach land.6 In 1977, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution prohibiting the hostile use of environmental modification techniques. The resulting “Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Technique (ENMOD)” committed the signatories to refrain from any military or other hostile use of weather-modification which could result in widespread, long-lasting, or severe effects.7 While these two events have not halted the pursuit of weather-modification research, they have significantly inhibited its pace and the development of associated technologies, while producing a primary focus on suppressive versus intensification activities.

 

http://www.auricmedia.net/weather-control-air-force-2025/

You might want to add this one. …..

 

People that do not believe they are using chem to modify the weather are very asleep,