Anonymous ID: 5c6fa5 May 23, 2019, 11:25 a.m. No.6568003   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8063 >>8093 >>8156 >>8271 >>8312

hey fags. jim stone quote today re: habbenings in DC

 

i started reading him regularly if for not other reason than variety in news diet. i gather from following his site the past couple of months that he isnt here and thinks people like us are wasting time with hopium. however, the fact he has so much trouble keeping his site going is one of the very reasons i go back to his ip.

anyways, you know shit is picking up when people that disagree on priorities or nature of problems start saying shit that is congruent to what their erstwhile aligned opposition (in ordinary times) is saying. e.g. before trump started in the potus game, my opinion of hannity was he was a dolt that could ape talking points but not have original ideas or identify matters of import on his own. therefore , i knew winds were shifting when he stopped bothering me because he seemed to be identifying (or at least talking about) issues on my radar. I think I am seeing something similar from stone right now this is on his site today

 

http://82.221.129.208/.wk8.html

 

> Pelosi has openly called for "intervention" against Trump, the VP, Trump's family, plus his cabinet and more

 

> There's a problem with this - and that is that in that context, "intervention" means "kill or jail them all". She did it during a one hour presser this morning.

 

> There is only one reason why Nancy would have spoken this way: To avoid going to jail or to avoid being held accountable for crimes against the United States. If she gets rid of Pence, Trump, Trump's family and cabinet and "whoever else", she'll become president and no one who had any legitimacy would be able to question it to any effect.

 

> And you can bet there would be a volley of pardons going off like a gatlin gun the second she seized power.

> This was a major escalation and development, it has my attention. TICK

Anonymous ID: 5c6fa5 May 23, 2019, 11:45 a.m. No.6568155   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6568024

i dunno. adam curtis makes a strong case that the cold war left us vulnerable to the consumerism push that they said was of necessity to grow and encourage without end, we never have looked back since. so theres that. Also Cold war set us up to buy into game theory for daily life of individuals (if we all can be paranoid and selfish at all times it will create stability was the unspoken of that campaign. enhanced the rat race for us). Russia generally as I understand it falls back. napolean coming to their door, led them to retreat inward and raze everything that could aid the french as they ran inward. it took hitler coming to their door for them to show want of adventure beyond their frontiers and into berlin.the only exception I can recall is Afghanistan, and thats arguable adventure given historic role of that state to their perimeter security. cabal fucks saw opportunity to inflict harm by setting 2 peoples they had seperate vendettas with, against one another for their own gain and twisted sense of karmic justice.