>>657064

philippe sereys de rothschild

he left out a PS

so Philippe Sereys confirmed

>>657434

any chance of limiting posts per anon to something

reasonable

seeing people hitting 40+ almost everybread

and well… 0 are noteworthy

>>657484

i am totally against censorship

but no reasonable anon posts more than 10 times

per bread

if i had my way, id get BO to post their ip hash

so i can crack it and go tear their system up…

but…..

>>657554

>Nope. We don't censor. Just use the filter.

have been. my breads end up with 400 posts or so

>>657582

ty anyways

from the one man chess team