>Disprove it
Have a look at his first link:
http://www.healthyfoodteam.com/human-meat-found-in-mcdonalds-meat-factory/
It says "FBI agenht Lloyd Harrison told Huzler…"
which proves that this is the source:
https://www.huzlers.com/mcdonalds-exposed-for-using-human-meat/
and in the logo at the top of that page, it says, "because you love being lied to".
Is that proof ok?
JA pretty much said that SR was the leaker in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp7FkLBRpKg
JA's defense is that the charges against him aren't true.
Great charges, though. I love the story they're setting up.
"Assange = Manning = Revealing atrrocities that Trump wants to keep hidden"
How could they resist that narrative?
The Democrats will be marching in the streets saying Assange is a hero, and then he'll say HRC 187 SR and they'll all have mental problems.
He gave Seth Rich's murder as an example of "very significant risks" taken by people who give information to wikileaks.
When the interview asked him what he was suggesting by referring to Seth Rich's killing, he said, "I'm suggesting that our sources take risks".
The interviewer asked him "was he one of your sources?" and he replied "We don't comment on who our sources are."
In interpret that as "saying it without saying it". He can't say it "officially" because wikileaks has that policy to protect the lives of their sources, but he can say it unofficially because SR's life no longer needs protecting.
Look at 1 and 2.
It could mean that LL authorized the original classification and Barr is her successor.