Anonymous ID: eb8f12 May 24, 2019, 10:58 a.m. No.6579223   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6578979

>NO. She was not replaced. You wouldn't replace with a faulty model.

 

There are strategic reasons to do this. If her replacement is faking infirmity (or if they replaced her with an individual that is actually infirm) it may play into a legal defense strategy based on mental incapacity.

Anonymous ID: eb8f12 May 24, 2019, 11 a.m. No.6579237   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6579214

 

They also like to leak information to the press and then use the resulting press stories as an additional source to justify their warrants. Absolute scumbags.

Anonymous ID: eb8f12 May 24, 2019, 11:12 a.m. No.6579337   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6579313

>So the question is WHY did the POTUS need to give Barr authority

 

For optics. That statement is made for the benefit of the public, the press, and Congress, who may not realize (or may be in denial about) the fact that Barr has this authority. It's like pointing out to Wile E. Coyote that he's already standing over the edge of the cliff, which triggers him to fall.