>>6579524 (pb)

Yep, I know that, but most don't and are limitted…thanks though anon. I stated that because of the OP…the poster obviously got the Q response and had to ask if it were assange…..this implies the anon knows quite a bit and has been active in attempt to understand due to being able to relate the Q post to enough to make that assumption and question it. Since the Q post didn't also have a linked response to number, the anon must not have known. So, two birds with one stone…I made it clear the posts are not being put up with RT's, and I pointed out what happens when that occurs by asking a question AND the results of those attempting to answer it (timestamps) will vary.

Thank you though anon, it is appreciated