>>>6578238 (PB)
>No, it's not unconstitutional.
>States have the complete right to determine how their electoral college votes are cast. THAT is in the Constitution.
>I wouldn't mention it, but this is about the 3rd or 4th time I've seen that assertion and it needs to be set straight.
>They are STILL going through the electoral college and will cast their votes in it, BUT they are defeating it (as the Dems say "making an end run around it") by saying that they will tie their votes to what happens nationally.
>They are assholes and the people who vote in favor of it are fools.
>>>6578253
>Actually, the states have COMPLETE authority as to how their votes are cast. I'm beginning to think we need a class in how the electoral college functions in a REPUBLIC.
You are WRONG but sort of right
1) States have the Complete Right to Determine How Their Electors are SELECTED.
2) It's unclear whether the States can '''BIND""" their electors.
3) This Popular Vote Gambit is, in fact, Constitutional.
4) However, it is ANTITHETICAL"" to the Constitution and therefore should be held Unconstitution'''
NOTE: This is very much like the 14th Amendment. It's constitutional because it was ratified properly and everything but it's so antithetical to the Constitution that it should be considered unconstitutional