Anonymous ID: 507f66 May 24, 2019, 10:02 p.m. No.6584320   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4323 >>4617

Anyone think this is BIG?

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/24/world/asia/trump-sumo.html

 

Break it down…

Japan trip mirrors Korea trip from beginning.

Sumo involves FORCE:

this mirrors Q 2347 AND Flight 93 theme

RED CARPET event… marker for MOAB

one month delta from NYT Michael Anton "Trolling the Fake News Media" story

Could be more disinfo, but I think it is most definitely at least disinfo.

But I think this actually WORKS… not so technical and autistic… more theatrical… but that could be an element of the disinfo too… we'll soon find out…

Anonymous ID: 507f66 May 24, 2019, 11:01 p.m. No.6584547   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4591 >>4607

>>6584311

Anons, EYES ON!

I watched this whole vid….

I NEVER heard of this Challenger theory or conceived of it until, like, yesterday. Now it is being pushed in multiple breads.

I'd say there are two primary options here:

1) this is some mega-MOAB

2) this is some last ditch FF

EITHER way, this needs attention.

Most of the vid focuses on the idea that the Challenger explosion was faked. But then at the end it picks up on the idea the all moon landings were faked, and more broadly that some YUGE fuckery has been going on with NASA. Anons might not wanna believe this, but if this is shillery we should debunk it.

Anons who pay attention know that Q "Anon" has pushed the "facial resemblance" truth bomb, and that is the core of this video.

Take a look and offer evidence and reasoning!

Anonymous ID: 507f66 May 24, 2019, 11:27 p.m. No.6584604   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4608

>>6584573

You fuckers know exactly what you're doing I guess? I guess I have no choice. I guess I'm with you. Yeah. Well, I guess I do have a choice, but I'm rollin with you. I have no idea how this works, but I guess I was prepared. That is some subtle shit and I have no idea how any "technology" can pick that up. None. There is no way. I know exactly what I am thinking and you probably do too, and I do not understand what is going on. OK, I think I'm with it.

Anonymous ID: 507f66 May 24, 2019, 11:51 p.m. No.6584678   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4690 >>4713 >>4724 >>4890

>>6584608

Haha… if you're not Q, I suspect you're "Q"…

I've been thinking that Q might somehow possibly catch your subvocalizations and overt internal mental imagery via tech embedded in consumer devices, but I haven't even THOUGHT the stuff I think they are hinting at here in years, or ever in any overt way. Normally I post very rational stuff based on evidence and reasoning, but now they are leading me into lala land… it is what it is I guess. Just ignore this post if you think I might otherwise post very rational stuff… maybe I am too drunk, even if Q tells me to stop drinking. And I will.. mostly … absofuckenlutely… but it takes time.