Anonymous ID: dbf48f May 25, 2019, 1:45 p.m. No.6588171   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8182 >>8192 >>8387 >>8637 >>8823

Pope Francis said Saturday that the medical profession should be committed to defending the sacred value of human life and reject abortion as incompatible with medical practice.

Is it any mystery why the CHURCH has always lied? CONTROL - they lie about abortion too cuz it is NOT prohibited by the HOLY BIBLE - In fact just the opposite - PROOF:

GOD DEFINES THE BEGINNING OF LIFE AND ENTRY OF THE SOUL INTO A NEWBORN

Genesis 2:7 King James Version (KJV): 7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

 

How does the church get around this plain language? HERE:

Full Question: My friend contends that the Bible can't be used to argue against abortion because nowhere in the Bible does it state that abortion is wrong and that life begins at conception. How do I respond?

Answer

Though we donโ€™t find the word abortion mentioned in any biblical text, we can deduce from Scripture, not to mention natural law, reason, Church teaching, and patristic witness that abortion is intrinsically evil.

TRANSLATION - TRUST THE CHURCH FATHERS WHO CAN "DEDUCE" THAT ABORTION IS EVIL

 

SO WHAT IS THIS ALL ABOUT? EZ - JUST THINK FOR YOURSELF

abortion is a fake and gay manufactured divisionfag issue

see how obvious it is now?

both sides GLOW like muhjoos

trust the plan

 

anons wake up

do you believe the extreme positions on abortion - BOTH sides - are a coincidence?

this is a MAJOR swamp cabal globalist effort to keep us divided

wake up! abortion is a non issue and all these pols are bought off to promote it

solved in 15 minutes

Anonymous ID: dbf48f May 25, 2019, 1:47 p.m. No.6588181   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8194 >>8199 >>8204 >>8251 >>8261 >>8335

muhjoo shitposters same as pro life extremists

why?

TO DIVIDE

HERE IS WHY:

 

The political purpose of anti-semitism is to galvanize support for a movement during times of social and political upheaval. Anti-semitism in America today is a variation on the deflection theme because it is not President Trump's administration that supports anti-semitism it is Obama's Leftist/Islamist axis legacy that is trying to depose President Trump. Obama's eight year radical socialist, anti-semitic, anti-American, pro-Muslim term encouraged Leftist/Islamist anti-semitism

The current anti-semitism in America is being fomented to solidify the Leftist/Islamist axis and deflect public attention from the movement's anti-American platform and their intention to destroy American democracy. The concurrent restrictions on freedom of speech in the United States is being instigated by the Deep State's attempt to further destabilize and destroy President Trump's government

Anonymous ID: dbf48f May 25, 2019, 1:48 p.m. No.6588191   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8205 >>8219 >>8236 >>8731

>>6588125

Two very old and very discredited anti-semitic/zionist conspiricy theories deserve special mention.

 

The first is the so-called "Blood Libel." This entials the zccusation that Jews kidnapped and murdered the children of Christians in order to use their blood as part of their religious rituals during Jewish holidays. The tale is extraordinary and wholly illogical. If anything, it is a projection onto the Jews of the darkest aspects of Paganism and other primitive religious rituals.

 

No observant Jew would ever conceive of such acts. It is absolutely contrary to The Ten Commandments. In addition to the fact that it conttitutes murder, the use of blood (human or otherwise) in cooking is strictly prohibited by the kosher dietary law. Even nlood from slaughtered animals may not be consumed, and it must be drained out of the animal and covered with earth.

 

While animal sacrifice was part of the practice of ancient Judaism, the Old Testament itself, and all Jewish teachings since, portray human sacrifice as one of the evils that separated the pagans of Canaan from the Hebrews. Nevertheless, this story was started and repeated to serve political ends. It has no basis in fact.

 

The second is known as "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion." Although the exact origin is unknown, its intent was to portray Jews as conspirators against the state. In 24 chapters, or protocols, allegedly minutes from meetings of Jewish leaders, the Protocols describes the secret plans of Jews to rule the world by manipulating the economy, controlling the media, and fostering religious conflict.

 

It is certainly plausible that the Jewish Rothschild banking family were the inspiration for this global jewish conspiracy. For centuries the Rothschilds built a massive fortune through financial and political intrique. It is beyond doubt that this Jewish family did indeed exert substantial influence on a broad range of historic events, from small to large.

 

However, even a casual study of the family history reveals that the primary agenda of the Rothschilds was money and power for themselves. Any consideration of Jewish religion, welfare or identity was a distant cousin to this primary consideration.

 

In any event, in 1903, portions of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion were first published in a Russian newspaper. Following the Russian Revolution of 1917, anti-Bolshevik emigres brought the Protocols to the west. Soon after, editions circulated across the globe. An Arabic translation first appeared in the 1920s.

 

In 1921, the London Times presented conclusive proof that the Protocols were a fraud and a plagiarism. They had been drawn primarily from an 1864 French political satire that had nothing to do with Jews. The satire entitled "Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu" was written as a protest against the Emporer Napoleon.

Anonymous ID: dbf48f May 25, 2019, 2:01 p.m. No.6588274   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8295

>>6588240

i believe abortion should be strictly limited after heartbeat to cases of rape incest and health pf the mother or fetus

>>6588263

lawfag supports over ruling of ROE v WADE

so whatever

People should choose what is acceptable and moral in our country

once that is done we all accept it

Anonymous ID: dbf48f May 25, 2019, 2:12 p.m. No.6588351   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8377 >>8393 >>8424

>>6588295

see i agree 100% with your post

it is a matter if YOUR conscience and relationship with God and Jesus

YOURS alone

some limits are needed yes but extreme positions (ban vs infanticide) are wrong FOR PUBLIC LAW AND POLICY

if yo believe in those positions i have ZERO objection but you cant impose them on 300 million people

Anonymous ID: dbf48f May 25, 2019, 3:22 p.m. No.6588791   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6588752

Oh there is yuge sauce for this

here is just one

I may not know Hebrew, but I know of many scholars who do, and they all agree that the proper translation of Exodus 20:13 is โ€œThou shalt not murder.โ€

https://apholt.com/2015/03/17/thou-shalt-not-kill-vs-thou-shalt-not-murder/

 

many many moar

i mean if killing was the rule how can war be in the bible commanded by god?

not to mention self defense and death penatly both of which are recognized n scripture

 

the more you knowโ€ฆ

tx anon