Anond didn't say they had the same circumstances, anon
said they were both set up. Just because Flynn's outcome was different
doesn't invalidate the claim. Learn logic.
>If you want to throw around criticisms on the basis of logic, you’ll need to be supporting far more precise uses of language.
I merely pointed out the logical failure of your argument. It in no way
invalidated the other anons argument. Anon said one thing, you offered
a red herring, a strawman, as a counter.
No, you don't understand logic.
>Where’s the evidence that Pence was “set up” for anything?
On top of my previous comment, I made no claim that he was or wasn't.
So yet another strawman, or you can't read.
"Unknown risk" isn't really the problem. Making sure that our enemies actually go
down for this requires waiting until the information is safe to release. It's a lot easier for
the criminals to fabricate alternative explanations if they know ahead of time what they
have to explain away.