Anonymous ID: bf4da9 May 26, 2019, 3:16 a.m. No.6591913   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1935

>>6591727

Your post reminded me of an observation I've made. I saw a story about a dog named "Ping-Pong" and I wondered: Does MSM/tech giants use "fake names" or names similar to subjects anons are interested in to skew search results? For example if "Ping-Pong" is in the news as a dog story does it "bury" Comet Ping Pong?

Anonymous ID: bf4da9 May 26, 2019, 3:38 a.m. No.6591943   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Anons,

 

For your deep state destroying enjoyment. The first couple stanzas in a "Spygate" version of Jabberwocky, the Lewis Carroll poem ( I hope copyright is expired, but I think it must be)

 

"Jabberwacky"

 

'Twas shilling time and the slimy Dems

Did FISA and dossier in the Swamp

All chumsy were the 5 Eyes of "govs", the WaPo, and Times

(but "no-name" wrath obtained)

 

"Beware the Jabberwack my son!

The texts, the spies, the redacted warrants and FOIA!

Beware the Pelosi horde

The frumpy Blasey-Ford!

 

What do anons think? Any suggestions to make it better?

Anonymous ID: bf4da9 May 26, 2019, 3:52 a.m. No.6591958   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6591915

I quit FB when they stopped letting me comment on posts about a doctor who was administering flu shots to babies without notifying the parents properly. However, I began noticing in about 2015/2016 that stories I would see on Facebook would turn up in the MSM "news" a day or so later. Once the full power of humans talking to each other was observed I think the censorship and manipulation really got going. My news feed was altered then I started to detect funny things elsewhere like wondering if people were seeing my posts and I theirs. Got spoopy and manipulated really fast. The vaccine issue is DA BOMB. If you can get regular people with children to see that the vaccines have NOTHING to do with preventing dangerous diseases and EVERYTHING to do with turning us into "cash cows" for Pharma, then you quickly get them to see that pretty much EVERY official narrative is a lie. If the "pillar" of public health is seen as a decaying stump then the whole rotten edifice is pretty easy to discern. Thanks FB!

Anonymous ID: bf4da9 May 26, 2019, 4:04 a.m. No.6591968   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6591960

I like it here, though I rather wish I was NOT relentlessly spied upon. I disagree a little about a secure network/information distribution platform. My body has an immune system. Exposure to 'information" is constant and not always good. Too much "sterility" and things go awry in my body and probably in life, too. I take care in my few social media excursions to exclude "bad" connections. I think it is enough to take care who I listen to rather than try to develop a "protected" platform. That said, if I continue to use computer tech I would like the "second version" to enable real privacy. It disgusts me to think that some "entities" are grabbing our information to analyze and manipulate us like bugs. The funny thing is that when you roll stones (as the Bible says) they roll back on you. Meaning that spies will discover that they are the ones with the most information to lose. Funny as "heck" but I still don't want every agency on the planet reading my mail!

Anonymous ID: bf4da9 May 26, 2019, 4:36 a.m. No.6592014   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Anons,

 

I like the "Glyphosate Girl" blogger who posts about the ongoing saga of the lawsuits against Monsanto due to NHL that appears to have been caused by glyphosate (the "active" ingredient in Round-up herbicide). Her most recent blog post exposes a lot of important information but I thought the issue of Monsanto using "spies" to befriend reporters is very interesting. In her last post, GG (Glyphosate Girl) links to a company that seems to be serving Monsanto's interest in suppressing the truth about glyphosate.

Anonymous ID: bf4da9 May 26, 2019, 4:53 a.m. No.6592060   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6591551

Great post. I prefer to pay for products that are humanely and responsibly raised (no China owned CAFOs!) even if the cost MORE. You cannot put a price tag on your health or the well-being of the farming family that provides the food! I avoid the big producers that you mention and I think that real competition (as should exist in a free market society) would bring down prices naturally with INCREASED quality. Regulatory capture is a BIG DEAL and is not only destroying our food supply but our health care as well. I like what Del Bigtree has to say on this subject. We would be better off WITHOUT the regulatory agencies. Then the consumer would KNOW the truth: There is no one protecting YOU, but YOURSELF. "Buyer Beware" is excellent advice. This is why I prefer to start looking for local food producers who I can talk to directly.