Canary trap
The intermediaries are obvious (Hussein in case it's not) but it goes back to China and the Cabal, of course.
Don't have access to that info. Loss of VJ's clearance hasn't been discussed that I am aware of, so I make the presumption that she still has it. Others in Hussein's circle are also cutouts to China, imo. China's still the safest place for them to park the info.
But if it's suspect, it's toxic.
Ultimate authority to allow access to classified intel = POTUS. If POTUS delegates authority to AG, AG is authorized to obtain, view and declassify as necessary.
AG is the final authority to determine what, if any, violations of the law may have occurred in the disclosure and/or public release of classified information.
Who's gonna criminally prosecute or bring a civil suit against the AG for exercising that authority?
The likely dodge is that the agencies involved in collecting/holding the classified info may make their own "determinations" as to what is or is not information within the compartments that must be disclosed to the AG. (Sleight of hand).
With the NSA firmly on POTUS' side, that's a really stupid losing play. We already have it all.
The interesting thing is that this sets up a classic pissing contest between the head law enforcement agency and the head intelligence agency.
DOJ - "We must see this information."
DNI - "What information? Nope, you can't have anything that isn't related to X, and I say it isn't related to X."
DOJ - "How do I know it's not related to X if I can't see it? You guys lie for a living, so WTF?"
DNI - "Too bad, fuck you."
DOJ - "I have cops and authority from POTUS. Wanna re-think that?"
DNI - "Ever heard of a burn bag, dipshit? You'll never get what you want anyway."
ENTER NSA.
The Bible is loaded with various literary devices, from allegories to zeugma…and people still "prophecy" from the Word in its simplest, literal form. John Nelson Darby did us no favors by introducing this into the American mainstream.
Literally NO major sect of Christianity in the Middle East, Europe or Asia has ever taken every thing written in the Bible as intended to be solely interpreted by the literal meaning of the words written.
Song of Solomon alone should tell the reader that there is more to the Bible than mere literal interpretation.
But fools abound.
If you're thinking linearly, it makes sense.
If the place is loaded w/ hills, jungle and shit like that, it's a whole 'nother ball game. BTDT.
I think you misinterpret my post, and project some judgment on me.
Fools refers to those who subscribe to the thought that the Bible must be taken as literally true, with the words meaning only what is stated as written. That is plainly not true. Two people can read the same verse and each can find separate - and valid - meaning from it.
What really hurts Christianity is the simple "take it literally" meaning that has spawned all the "rapture" crapture eschatology. It's a fear industry unto itself in America. The major denominations around the world just look at those people and scratch their heads. It's like they never graduated from the toddler Sunday School.
I hope this clarifies my comment for you.
Thanks, same here too. And I owe you an apology, someone else chimed in throwing some shade my way and I posted thinking you were trying to start a tag-team shill slide.
We're on the same team. God's got this. (Sometimes we humble sinners get fixated on the simple-minded to recall it, though.)