Anonymous ID: 850128 May 26, 2019, 8:37 a.m. No.6592996   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3030

>>6592908

I’d have to respectfully disagree.

The Textus Recptus is really worth researching.

http://textusreceptusbibles.com/Editorial/Apostles_TextusReceptus

 

Textus Receptus Bibles

Tyndale Bible1534

Coverdale Bible 1534

Matthew's Bible1537

The Great Bible1539

Geneva Bible1560

Bishops Bible1568

King James Bible 1611

King James Bible 1769

Webster's Bible1833

Young's Literal Translation1862

Julia E. Smith1876

J.P. Green's Literal Translation1993

Revised Young's Literal Translation2000

King James Bible 2016 (not NKJV)