Anonymous ID: e7fc1b May 26, 2019, 8:37 a.m. No.6592999   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6592965

"hampered by aides…" right, according to "sources" too, I bet.

 

Hoft has zero credibility. His sources are either never right, or he's

intentionally putting out disinformation. There's more to the story.

Anonymous ID: e7fc1b May 26, 2019, 8:52 a.m. No.6593092   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3120

>>6593083

"Does jews"… which is in the meme I replied to, and your dumbass too exception to. Are you just plain retarded, or illiterate?

Try not to spit crumbs (metaphorically) when you reply.

 

Shall I link to the word metaphorically at dictionary.com as well?

Anonymous ID: e7fc1b May 26, 2019, 9:15 a.m. No.6593218   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6593203

Both are reporting on what the New York Times is reporting. It's meta-reporting.

It's that sort of news laundering they use to convince us something has merit when

in fact it is just another made up fantasy. This is how fake news works.

Anonymous ID: e7fc1b May 26, 2019, 9:20 a.m. No.6593250   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3258 >>3267 >>3284

>>6593234

They're all citing the NYT and the NYT is citing "sources." FFS, this

isn't credible at all. The NYT is trying to make it look like there's still

legitimate push-back within the Trump administration. There isn't.

They're lying, or being lied to. Take your pick.

Anonymous ID: e7fc1b May 26, 2019, 9:24 a.m. No.6593280   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3316

>>6593262

>The focus should be on whether or not Occhionero is credible.

Agreed. That's why I'm puzzled by some of the pushback in "normie"

twatter land to the report. Yeah, there's a connection to Q that they

don't like, but the majority of his report has nothing to do with Q. Is

Occhionero credible or not should be the focus. Simona doesn't like

him, that's for sure.

Anonymous ID: e7fc1b May 26, 2019, 9:28 a.m. No.6593304   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3319

>>6593258

He's citing the same damned sources. How the hell does that make

it legitimate? Seriously, this is how "news laundering" works.

These "journalists" all write stories ultimately sourced from the

same place doesn't make it legitmate. It doesn't matter how

many people "agree" that it's valid if the source isn't.

 

We won't get past this fake news nonsenseuntil people

wake up to this truth.

Anonymous ID: e7fc1b May 26, 2019, 9:33 a.m. No.6593344   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6593319

We don't. We don't know anything about what they have done or are

doing. That's the point. All these click-bait pundits are being used to

spread disinformation, and the world continues to fall for it.

 

In this case, the NYT is trying to spin a fake story in a way that makes

Trump look bad. "Oh noes! There's still #resistance in the Trump

administration! Even they know how bad he is!"

 

If there's one thing we can be sure if, it's that they are lying, always.