"hampered by aides…" right, according to "sources" too, I bet.
Hoft has zero credibility. His sources are either never right, or he's
intentionally putting out disinformation. There's more to the story.
"hampered by aides…" right, according to "sources" too, I bet.
Hoft has zero credibility. His sources are either never right, or he's
intentionally putting out disinformation. There's more to the story.
I doesn't know, does they?
Learn sarcasm dumbass.
Lack of education does that, too.
"Does jews"… which is in the meme I replied to, and your dumbass too exception to. Are you just plain retarded, or illiterate?
Try not to spit crumbs (metaphorically) when you reply.
Shall I link to the word metaphorically at dictionary.com as well?
Both are reporting on what the New York Times is reporting. It's meta-reporting.
It's that sort of news laundering they use to convince us something has merit when
in fact it is just another made up fantasy. This is how fake news works.
Fake news, anon. Don't fall for it.
He's not able to provide more details because it was a vision he had. He does this all
the time.
They're all citing the NYT and the NYT is citing "sources." FFS, this
isn't credible at all. The NYT is trying to make it look like there's still
legitimate push-back within the Trump administration. There isn't.
They're lying, or being lied to. Take your pick.
>The focus should be on whether or not Occhionero is credible.
Agreed. That's why I'm puzzled by some of the pushback in "normie"
twatter land to the report. Yeah, there's a connection to Q that they
don't like, but the majority of his report has nothing to do with Q. Is
Occhionero credible or not should be the focus. Simona doesn't like
him, that's for sure.
He's citing the same damned sources. How the hell does that make
it legitimate? Seriously, this is how "news laundering" works.
These "journalists" all write stories ultimately sourced from the
same place doesn't make it legitmate. It doesn't matter how
many people "agree" that it's valid if the source isn't.
We won't get past this fake news nonsenseuntil people
wake up to this truth.
We don't. We don't know anything about what they have done or are
doing. That's the point. All these click-bait pundits are being used to
spread disinformation, and the world continues to fall for it.
In this case, the NYT is trying to spin a fake story in a way that makes
Trump look bad. "Oh noes! There's still #resistance in the Trump
administration! Even they know how bad he is!"
If there's one thing we can be sure if, it's that they are lying, always.
Maybe for them ignorance is bliss…
Hey there, Q.