>>6593544 pb
You have posted on the Q-is-a-larp them many, many times, Q. Over 20 maybe? The part about the "dangers" of Q is newer, tho. Christchurch, San Diego shooters posting on 8cha /pol/, Jim Watkin's bedroom invaded by ViCE reporters, Christchurch Call. Most attacks are now on 8chan. But aren't they really designed to destroy QResearch?
Yes, QResearch is Q. But my point is that the media never talk about QResearch per se. They talk about 8chan. They want to get rid of 8chan and its "hate speech. They never even mention QResearch. If they used that name, it might make people curious. "QResearch" doesn't sound like a hate site, sounds like a NEWS site. So they attack 8chan instead.
ha-ha, a P from [P]elosi?
>>6593544 rt >>5792657 ————————————–——– QResearch a significant threat to MSM
Q 5792657
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: b16726 No.5792657 📁
Mar 20 2019 13:45:07 (EST)
Ask yourself a very simple Q.
Would the FAKE NEWS media (& other controlled assets) expend this amount of time and resource attacking [attempt to discredit - cast as conspiracy - LARP] this movement IF IT DID NOT POSE A SIGNIFICANT THREAT [DANGER]?
YOU ATTACK THOSE WHO THREATEN YOU THE MOST.
Depends a lot of time of day, too. When Q posts on graveyard–even pre Captcha–bread speeds up but never gets really fast.
@FastJack's backup for QRV: https://poal.co/s/QRP/59504
>>6594083 @FastJack's backup for QRV
Interesting contrast between 8chan and QResearch culture. 8chan is rough, tough GTFO to newbies but also values independence and freedom. QResearch shared 8chan's commitment to free speech but also additional values like patriotism, unity, family, friendship, prayer. There is also a focus on information sharing ("we are the news") and transformation (anons know).
No–which they don't. Took me awhile to see the pattern, tho–hundreds of anti-Q articles (probably NONE of which use the word "QResearch" but instead just say "QAnon" and talk about "8chan").
Re: the fact that MSM never mentions QResearch but just "8chan"
What should we do about it?
Good question.
We don't intereact directly withe the MSM (although I did call their reporters out and Newsweek wrote an article about it, tho they don't know the source is from here; picked it up from Joe M twiiter).
Reporters like Will Sommer (and probably many moar) hang out here. They know what we REALLY do and turn around and distort the truth. Can we make them talk about "QResearch"? IDK.
But first step is to SEE THEIR STRATEGY: to only talk about 8chan ("a radicalizing forum") and NEVER about QResearch. That's where we're at right now.
Step 2, anons??
>ill yourself and livestream it
What a fun way to fill up the bread. Sorry you're feeling triggered, fren.